Online Poker Tournament Tricks for 2025 (edition with Jesper Hougaard)

Online Poker Tournament Strategy, Tips, and Tricks with Jesper “kipsterDK” Hougaard – 4 instructional hands from the PokerStars EPT Online Main Event 2020.
Recommended Poker Sites – Editor’s Pick
Image
Arved Klöhn Pokerlistings Author
  • Fact Checked by: PokerListings
  • Last updated on: September 23, 2024

In 2020 PokerStars hosted the EPT for the first time online. The main event with a buy-in of $5,200 saw a massive field of over 1,300 players and a prize pool of more than $6.5 Million.

We wanted to know how a professional poker player approaches those tournaments and what aspects he thinks about when he plays certain hands. Seasoned poker pro Jesper Hougaard agreed to take us through his pivotal hands from this tournament and explain his thought process in detail, giving insight into how poker tournament strategies have evolved in the year 2020 – 2025.

Hands covered:

If you want to participate in in of the big tournaments at PokerStars, sign up by clicking on the banner below. You can qualify for the big events via one our exclusive PokerListings freerolls.

About Jesper Hougaard

Jesper “KipsterDK” Hougaard is a renowned PLO specialist and nowadays foremost a cash game player. But he’s also an accomplished Hold’em Player and has had a lot of success at the live and online tournament tables. He has won two WSOP Bracelets and was the first player to win the PokerStars Sunday Million twice back in 2008 and 2009.

Jesper did not make it into the money at the PokerStars EPT Online and the four hands he dissects for us below are from the early levels of the tournament. The hands might not be as glamorous as some spectacular final table hands but they show how tiny details often alter the course of a hand (and an entire tournament) drastically.

From here on we let Jesper take it away:

Jesper "kipsterDK" Hougaard
Jesper “kipsterDK” Hougaard

Hand #1: 8-8 against a recreational player

The first meaningful hand comes along in the second level where I 3-bet pockets 8s in the small blind and play a big pot against a seemingly recreational player.

– Preflop

Blinds: 600 / 1,200 Ante 150

CO: 148,069
Hero (SB): 259,049 -
8 clubs 8 8 hearts 8

Preflop: fold, fold, fold, fold, CO raises to 3,400, fold, Hero raises to 12,600, fold, CO calls

Why I want to play against the cut-off

The guy in the cut-off is certainly a recreational player. This is very early in tournament. I haven’t seen that much of him, but I can see already that his *VPIP is very high. He’s definitely the guy I want to get involved with and I want to escalate pots with him. Because he’s going to make a lot more post-flop mistakes than the average player in the field.

*VPIP – (average total percent of times the opponent puts money into the pot preflop – see How to read poker stats)

Why I reraise preflop

He opens in the cut-off for a bit more than a min raise and with Eights in the small blind it’s a pretty mandatory 3-bet. Calling and *set-mining is bad out of position. On the button I would have been more inclined to call against this guy. But in the small blind it’s better to take the initiative.

*Set-Mining means calling with a small or medium pocket pair in hopes of hitting a set.

How much to reraise preflop

I go for a 3.5x reraise which is pretty standard. I know that people who work with poker solvers advocate going even bigger with their 3-bets in this situation. With 3-bets out of position people make it 4x and even a bit more when they have deep stacks. The reason is they want to discourage calling ranges to continue. It’s typically better to just win the hand right there and then. I made it a little bit less because I don’t mind taking a flop against this guy. Even out of position because he’s the guy we want to play hands with.

– Flop

Flop: (27,600) -
K hearts K 6 spades 6 4 diamonds 4

Hero checks, CO bets 10,800, Hero calls

Why I check the flop

If I start betting this K-6-4 flop I will be inflating the pot unnecessarily. If I bet here, I’m not going to get much value out of anything. He might call with a hands like Ace-high, but I block hands like 8-7-suited that might continue. It’s better to check and let him bluff. If it goes check-check I can still get one value-bet in later along the way. It turned out, he bet. With this bet I have a mandatory call here. It is too weak to check-fold Eights on this board.

– Turn

Turn: (49,200) -
K hearts K 6 spades 6 4 diamonds 4 9 diamonds 9

Hero checks, CO bets 26,400, Hero calls

Why I call again on the turn

The Nine on the turn shouldn’t really change anything. My opponent is not supposed to have a Nine in his hand. He can have hands like K-Q or K-J and the occasional A-K that decided not to 4-bet preflop. Those are the main hands that he’d value-bet twice. There are only a few sets – Sixes and Fours – in his range. Should he have called preflop with worse Kings, like K-T-suited he might find a check on this turn. Meaning, it’s a pretty narrow range that value bets the flop and the turn. Against some guys you might consider check-folding the turn, but against this player and such a narrow value range, I can continue and re-evaluate on the river.

*Value Bet – Betting because you expect to have better equity than your opponent – you expect them to call.

Is a recreational player bluffing the turn often enough?

Recreational players come in a lot of different shapes and sizes. This guy is an aggressive recreational player. The reason I want to continue on the turn is that he doesn’t have many value hands that he’s happy to go three or even two streets with. Yes, there’s the occasional A-K and K-Q, K-J or a set that he’s willing to value bet twice. All the other value hands, like a weaker King check the turn. But every time he picks up diamonds he continues as a bluff and he might continue Broadway hands like Q-T. In general, against players of this type I have to give them a wider range and assume they don’t know exactly what they’re doing.

What is my plan for the river?

If my opponent jams on the river I have to fold. If he wants to *triple-barrel a complete air ball I congratulate him. But there are not many people that do that in those kinds of tournaments. He still has close to half his starting stack and it would be suicidal if he decided to go for a big bluff on the river. I’m banking on him checking back the river if he misses.

*Make a third consecutive bet with no value hand – a big bluff basically

– River

River: (102,000) -
K hearts K 6 spades 6 4 diamonds 4 9 diamonds 9 J spades J

Hero checks, CO checks

The river is a bad card

The Jack on the river is obviously a bad card. A lot of the hands he semi-bluffed with, like Q-T or J-T or

A♦
J♦
which were air-balling on the flop and picked up equity on the turn just got there. As it turns out he had Ace-Jack. This was an unfortunate start to the tournament.

– Showdown

CO shows A clubs A J clubs J and wins 102,000

Hand #2: Let him bluff or seal the deal?

The next big hand I play in the 3rd level against an aggressive regular:

– Preflop

Blinds: 800 / 1,600 Ante 200

BU: 346,127
Hero (SB): 199,910 -
A clubs A Q clubs Q

Preflop: fold, fold, fold, fold, fold, BU raises to 3,200, Hero raises to 13,760, fold, BU calls

Playing against a reg

Preflop is just very standard. The button opens and I have a massive hand with Ace-Queen-suited in the Small Blind. My read on the Button (Christian ‘WATnlos’ Rudolph) is that he’s a very loose and aggressive reg. He plays very many hands and is almost spewy aggro. With Ace-Queen I have a mandatory reraise and make it roughly 4x.

– Flop

Flop: (30,720) -
Q spades Q 9 spades 9 4 clubs 4

Hero bets 16,000, BU calls

What hands would I bet with on this flop?

This is obviously a really good flop for me. On this draw heavy board I will always have a very high *c-bet frequency. I would bet with all my value hands, which are Aces, Kings, Queens, Ace-Queen or King-Queen. This means I also have to find enough bluffs to c-bet with on this flop. For example, with King-Jack or Jack-Ten I’d always be betting here. That means I will be betting here with a lot of semi-bluffs. When I flop this good, I think betting half the pot is a reasonable way to start the hand.

*C-bet frequency – How often you’re making a continuation bet

– Turn

Turn: (62,720) -
Q spades Q 9 spades 9 4 clubs 4 7 spades 7

Hero checks, BU bets 38,400, Hero raises to 169,950 (all-in)

I decided to check and my opponent bet 60% of the pot. I was really unsure of whether to *jam or to call. This is the important spot in this hand.

*Jam or Shove – Go all-in and bet your entire chip stack

Why the check-raise all-in on the turn is problematic

If I go all-in, I’m never in good shape when my opponent calls me. Maybe there is the occasional King-Queen with the

K♠
or Ace-Queen with the
A♠
, but I’m not even sure that he bets those hands. The optimal strategy according to people with solvers and *GTO is to just check-call the turn and let my opponent bluff the river, because I’m not called by worse hands when I check-jam the turn.

GTO (Game Theory Optimal) refers to the best method of play in a situation where you’re unexploitable

Why I check-raise regardless

There is merit to my check-raise. With my all-in I avoid putting myself in a tricky spot on the river if the river comes for example Ten, Jack or a Spade. There are a lot of cards on the river – between 30-40% – that are going to be very ugly for me. It might sound weird, but check-raising all-in on the turn is the save play. Because that way I avoid playing a lot of tough rivers out of position against a loose-aggressive player. It’s also a way to deny hands with one Spade their equity. For example, a hand like Jack-Ten or Nine-Eight with a single spade has a lot of equity against me. And my opponent will feel inclined to bluff those on the turn, but cannot profitably call an all-in.

On the other hand, once I call this turn, I’ve basically told my opponent I have Ace-Queen or better. If I call and the board bricks – let’s say it comes 4 or 7 – my opponent is not too likely to continue bluffing.

There is one thing that this hand boils down to: denying my opponent equity with his semi bluffs versus letting him bluff on the river. I could be persuaded otherwise, but overall, I think there is more merit in denying him equity by going all-in than in allowing him to bluff on the river.

– Showdown

BU folds, Hero wins 101,120

Interlude: Tripling up with a Straight Flush (almost)

A couple hands later I triple up with a straight flush. Or at least I would have if the players had played how they are supposed to play.

– Preflop

Blinds: 800 / 1,600 Ante 200

UTG: 147,158
Hero (MP): 470,670 -
10 spades 10 9 spades 9
BB: 264,528

Preflop: UTG raises to 3,200, fold, Hero calls, fold, fold, fold, BB raises to 17,600, UTG raises to 41,600, Hero folds, BB calls

The recreational player that I played hand #1 from above with opens from UTG. He still is the guy I want to get involved with and Ten-Nine-suited is very playable. But we get squeezed by the big blind and the recreational player four-bets. Obviously, I cannot continue now against a four-bet and have to fold.

– Postflop

Flop: (88,600) -
8 spades 8 7 spades 7 6 hearts 6

BB checks, UTG bets 105,358 (all-in), BB calls

Turn: (299,316) - J spades J
River: (299,316) - 6 diamonds 6

UTG shows 8 clubs 8 7 clubs 7
BB shows 9 hearts 9 9 diamonds 9 - wins 299,316

I would have flopped the absolute world

Sometimes you flop the world but no other player has anything so you wouldn’t get stacks in. But with the two specific hands they have here, we might have gotten all-in 3-way on the flop. And just to make matters worse, I would have turned a straight-flush.

If the recreational player had just called the 3-bet before the flop, I definitely would have continued as well. And given his stack size, he should probably just fold to the 3-bet with Eight-Seven-suited. If he decides to continue, 4-betting is pretty bad, and he should just call. This just goes to show that had the recreational player done what he is supposed to do, I would have at least doubled up, maybe even more.

Hand #3: Bet sizes are everything

This hand is godawful. I had a technical issue and came back late from a break. My time bank was gone. Especially on the turn I end up panicking a little bit.

– Preflop

Blinds: 1,250 / 2,500 Ante 325

BU: 510,869
Hero (BB): 248,447 -
A spades A J hearts J

Preflop: fold, fold, fold, fold, BU raises to 7,500, fold, Hero raises to 30,000, BU calls

Call or 3-bet with Ace-Jack in the Big Blind?

After the button opens, I can do both in the big blind – call or raise. I think 3-betting is standard as I am pushing equity against the range my opponent opens on the button with.

Once in a while it’s also okay to flat Ace-Jack and have a big Ace in your range when the board comes Ace-high. The player on the button will represent such a board strongly and your hand can withstand a lot of heat.

This time I decided to 3-bet and out of position my 3-bet is larger. I specifically made it 4 times the size of the initial raise.

– Flop

Flop: (63,850) -
9 spades 9 5 hearts 5 3 clubs 3

Hero bets 43,500, BU calls

Betting this flop is superior

On the flop I have a *stack to pot ratio of 3. I don’t think this flop plays very well as a check-call and betting here is superior. In my range are all the overpairs and on a 9-5-3-flop there are not many hands in my opponent’s range that he’s comfortable stacking off with.

*Stack to pot ratio is your stack amount in relation to the pot amount. In this example, having a ratio of 3 means my stack is three times the pot amount.

Betting that much was a mistake

But I think I made a mistake with my bet sizing on the flop. I went for a bet of two thirds the size of the pot instead of sizing down. By sizing down and going for one third instead of two thirds I gain the advantage of being able to barrel off over multiple streets without committing too much of my stack. By betting this much on the flop I’m representing Tens or Jacks. Hands that want to bring the stack to pot ratio down so that I can shove the turn or at least take away the decisions on the turn.

My opponent does not have very many hands in his range that he loves to stack off with over two streets. However, a bet sizing of 20,000 on the flop bloats the pot less, leaves the stack to pot ratio higher and makes it much cheaper to continue with a barrel on the turn. If I had Aces, Kings or Queens I’d definitely go for the small size.

I don’t think my bet sizing is very good and now that I analyze it, this is the hand that I played the worst in the whole tournament. A smaller sizing on the flop would have created a completely different situation for the turn. Instead of a stack to pot ratio of 1.2 on the turn I could have had a ratio of 2 which would have allowed me to fire a barrel without decimating my stack.

– Turn

Turn: (150,850) -
9 spades 9 5 hearts 5 3 clubs 3 Q clubs Q

Hero bets 75,000, BU raises to 435,020 (all-in), Hero folds

BU wins 225,850

What hands does my opponent call the flop with?

My opponent calls my flop bet with a lot of hands. His range consists of Fours, Sixes through Eights, and hands like

A♥
4♥
. Many of those hands stick around on the flop, but don’t want to face a barrel on the turn.

What can I represent on the turn?

The

Q♣
on the turn completes some of my bluffing range on the flop, for example, hands like Ace-Queen or King-Queen. If I had a hand like
K♠
Q♠
I definitely would have bet the flop since I cannot take this hand to showdown. With any combination of Clubs, like
K♣
J♣
I would bet the turn and get it in. In general, this queen on the turn is better for my range than for his range. And I still have Aces, Kings and Nines in my range.

Betting the turn is problematic

The fact that the queen looks better for my range than for his, sucked me into betting the turn. By betting on the turn, I can put a lot of pressure on hands like small pairs. But I don’t block any clubs. It would be better to have a club in my hand as this would reduce the number of hands my opponent can continue with.

With hands like sets or two clubs – for example

A♣
4♣
– my opponent continues and I put him on one of these hands once he raises the turn.

I’m in this really awkward spot because the stack to pot ratio is just a little bit over 1. This is a hand where I really could have used a minute or two in my time bank. I think if I had more time I would have just given up on the turn. All in all, I’m in this spot by sizing so big on the flop. Once I’ve sized it so big on the flop, I don’t have room to barrel this turn.

Shoving the turn would have been better

Even shoving the turn is better than my sizing. A hand like

A♣
4♣
gets to own my soul with my bet sizing. But I had zero seconds in my time bank, panicked a little bit and came up with a bad solution on the flop and the half pot on the turn is probably the worst of all options.

The best solution here is to check-fold, the second best is to jam, and my approach is the worst. Of course, sometimes my opponent has sixes, folds the turn, we move on and never think about this hand again. But analyzing shows this was a poorly played hand on my part.

Hand #4: A compounded mistake

The next hand is one orbit after the previous hand and I’m in the big blind again.

– Preflop

Blinds: 1,500 / 3,000 Ante 325

MP: 406,763
Hero (BB): 106,397 -
10 clubs 10 7 diamonds 7

Preflop: fold, fold, fold, MP raises to 6,750, fold, fold, fold, Hero calls

This should have been a fold

In this situation with 35 Big Blinds I should just fold Ten-Seven-off in the Big Blind. Had I been full stacked it would have been a different story. I don’t work with *solvers in Hold’em, so I don’t know what a solver would say. But my gut feeling tells me that I should fold preflop with this stack. We’ll see why on the flop.

Solvers – poker software that offers game theory optimal (GTO) solutions to a specific scenario – which the user inputs, like table action and bet sizes.

– Flop

Flop: (18,000) -
10 hearts 10 4 diamonds 4 4 clubs 4

Hero checks, MP bets 4,500, Hero calls

Now I flop a ten and it’s really tough to get away from it. My opponent bets small and obviously I just have a call here.

– Turn

Turn: (27,000) -
10 hearts 10 4 diamonds 4 4 clubs 4 9 clubs 9

Hero checks, MP bets 20,400, Hero calls

Why my opponent might be bluffing the turn

The

9♣
on the turn is an interesting card because it’s very *wet card. I feel like my opponent is going to continue with his semi bluffs on this turn. Anytime he has a hand like Jack-Eight, Eight-Seven, Queen-Jack or two clubs – hands that he very likely bets on this dry flop – he will be incentivized to apply a lot of pressure on me on the turn as well. Because I don’t have very many hands that stack off here. It’s tough to have a Four and I have zero overpairs in my range.

*Wet cards are those that connect well to the board and are draw heavy, allowing a player to make stronger hands like flushes and straights. Opposite are dry cards or dry boards.

Had this been a dry turn, let’s say a Two, Three or Five, there are a lot less combinations my opponent can have that have no showdown value and that he’s incentivised to continue betting with.

I’m at the top of my range

It doesn’t look like a good hand, but any Ten is very high up in my range. I have very few Fours – maybe Four-Five-suited, Six-Four-suited or Ace-Four-suited. But there are very few combinations with Fours in my range. I’m probably also continuing the flop versus such a small bet size with any two Broadway cards, any Ace-high. Meaning, this Ten is pretty high up in my calling-range. The wetness of the turn suckered me in and I’m check-calling again to re-evaluate on the river.

– River

River: (67,800) -
10 hearts 10 4 diamonds 4 4 clubs 4 9 clubs 9 5 spades 5

Hero checks, MP bets 108,000, Hero calls 74,422

The river brings a super brick, unfortunately. My opponent jams and this is a horrible spot that I got myself into.

A hero call against my opponent’s range

I think Ace-Ten is the worst hand that my opponent goes for three streets of value with. Any worse Ten finds a check on one of the streets. He’s representing Aces through Jacks, Nines, Ace-Ten and random Fours.

Yes, he has value hands that he can shove the river with, but I decided that he has enough hands like Eight-Seven-suited, Queen-Jack, Jack-Eight-suited, or random bluffs that he plays this way. My opponent can afford to bluff this river and his stack is not too much compromised and so far, he played quite aggressively. That’s why I decided to make a hero call.

It’s tough for me to have hands that are way better. I never have overpairs, I never have Tens or Nines, I have very few Fours in my range. Ten-Seven plays effectively as good as Queen-Ten in this situation.

– Showdown

MP shows
A clubs A 10 clubs 10 and wins 216,644

Once I have decided to call preflop, it’s really tough to fold postflop. After analyzing the hand I’m okay with my postflop play, but not my preflop play. Here one mistake compounds the others and I’d love to have someone put this hand through PioSOLVER and find out whether Ten-Seven-off with 35 Big Blinds is a call before the flop. In hindsight I definitely should have just folded.

With this 4th hand Jesper’s run at the PokerStars EPT Main Event came to an early end.

Would you have played something differently, do you agree or disagree with his reasoning? Please leave a comment below.

If you too want to play huge online poker tournaments, take a look at our PokerStars Review and sign up at the largest online poker site or check our overview of the best online tournament sites.

Recommended