No-Limit Strategy: Position and Drawing Hands Pt. 2

Recommended Poker Sites – Editor’s Pick
Image
Arved Klöhn Pokerlistings Author
  • Fact Checked by: PokerListings
  • Last updated on: January 13, 2025

In No-Limit Hold’em, drawing hands can often be very profitable.

In part one of this article, we analyzed the play of drawing hands in heads-up situations and concluded an aggressive approach is usually best.

In part two, we’ll discuss playing drawing hands in multi-way pots. To play correctly, and thus maximize potential profit, it’s critical to understand how position influences optimal strategy.

As a general rule, against exactly three opponents, it’s usually correct to play as you would in a heads-up pot – aggressively.

One of the few exceptions to this rule is if you’re second to act and the pre-flop raiser has position on you. In this situation, if the first player bets and all you have is a draw, it’s generally best to proceed very cautiously – at least until you see how the pre-flop raiser acts.

However, if you’re in a pot against more than three players, your position – relative to both the pre-flop raiser and the post-flop bettor (if you’re neither) – is an important factor to consider before developing a strategy for the hand.

Think Position First in Poker

Consider one of the more common cases:

You’re in a standard $2/$4 NL game and are dealt 7 6 in the cut-off. A player in middle position limps in, so you limp too. The button then raises to $18.

Both the big blind and the middle position limper call and so do you. If the flop comes K 10 5 , how should you play the hand?

If the action is checked to you, it’s usually best to check as well. Let the pre-flop raiser (the button) decide what to do before committing more chips to the pot. If he bets, you’ll see how the other two players react to the bet before you have to make a decision.

If either player check-raises, you can muck your hand, saving a bet. If both players call the bet, you might also consider folding. This may seem counterintuitive (as you would seem be getting very good odds to try and hit your flush), but with two callers, it’s also much more likely you’re up against a bigger flush draw.

Of course, if you’d flopped an open-ended straight draw instead of the flush draw, you’d happily call despite drawing to a worse hand (a straight as opposed to a flush), because then you’d be drawing to the nuts. Generally speaking, in multi-way pots, the quality of your draw is much more important than it is in heads-up play.

It’s significantly more profitable to be drawing to the nut flush or the top end of the straight draw. There’s nothing worse than making your draw and discovering you still have the second-best hand.

Alternatively, if either of the players acting before you bets the flop, you’ll have to decide between raising (ill-advised), calling or folding. If you think the button (the pre-flop raiser) is likely to raise, you’ll be better off folding. If instead you think he may call or even fold, then calling is perfectly acceptable.

There are several important positional factors to consider before deciding on a particular action (when you’ve flopped a draw). Successful players, at minimum, will automatically be aware of the following:

  1. Who was the pre-flop raiser, and where is the post-flop action most likely to come from (in relation to you)?
  2. How many people will act after you?
  3. If the pre-flop raiser has position on you, how many people are between you and him and are these players tricky or straightforward?

Assuming you have, at least, considered the above, what should you do with this information?

The basic principle is relatively simple:

With a drawing hand (on the flop), you ideally would prefer one of two outcomes – you successfully steal the pot, or you get the right odds (pot and/or implied) to try and make your hand (this is often easier if there’s more than one opponent). Both outcomes are okay.

What you don’t want is to end up heads-up against a strong made hand without the correct odds to draw to your hand. Although this may occasionally happen if you’re aggressively raising (or re-raising) your draws, it’s generally best to try and avoid this situation.

What does this suggest about optimal post-flop strategy? If you’re acting immediately before the pre-flop raiser (or the player you believe is intending to bet the flop) and the action is checked to you, you should generally check and re-evaluate when the action gets back to you.

By betting, you tend to reduce your implied odds. If the original raiser has a hand and raises your flop bet, it will usually drive out the other players leaving you heads-up (and out of position) with a drawing hand unlikely to be a favorite.

If you’re first to act and the pre-flop raiser is last to act, you have three options:

  1. Bet. In this case, you’re hoping to either pick up the pot or that the players in the middle call and build a pot for you. If you get a couple of callers and then the pre-flop raiser raises, you’ll have to decide whether to call (and hope the other players do too, giving you the correct odds to make your hand), or re-raise (representing a set or two pair) and try to steal the pot.
  2. Check and call (if he or others bet). Here you’re simply trying to make your hand cheaply and hope to get the correct odds to do so.
  3. Check (with the intention of making a large check-raise to try and take down the pot immediately). A problem with this strategy is if you’re up against a real hand. If your opponent moves all-in, you may have to call, depending on the stack sizes and the pot odds. Or if he simply calls, you’ll have to act first on the turn and if you miss your draw, you’ll be in an awkward spot.

Alternatively, if you’re last to act and the pre-flop raiser is immediately before you, it may be best to call (rather than raise) if he bets. Your intention in this case is to try and bring along some of the other players (who checked to the raiser on the flop), thus improving both your implied and your pot odds.

Example:
Imagine you limp from early position with 9 8 and three players call behind you. The button then raises, and everyone calls. The flop comes 5 6 7 , giving you both a flush draw and an open-ended straight draw. If the first players check and you’re next to act, consider checking as well to see how the pre-flop raiser and everyone else reacts. If the raiser makes a bet and multiple players call, you should evaluate stack sizes and your odds before deciding on a move. If you think a large check-raise might chase away better draws or isolate you against a hand you can outdraw, it can be a viable option, but remember you’re still not guaranteed to be a favorite against multiple opponents.

Finally, if you’re last to act and the original raiser acts first and bets the flop, you once again have some good options. If other players in the middle call, you can either call, trying to hit your hand cheaply then extract value (this is generally the better approach, because the chances of stealing the pot against multiple players are relatively low) or play more aggressively and raise on the semi-bluff.

The main point to remember:

To maximize your profit on your drawing hands, be aware of your relative position and adjust your play accordingly.

Good luck, and good flops.

Advanced Multi-Way Dynamics for Drawing Hands

Multi-way pots introduce complexities that often escape less experienced players, but high-level professionals know that adjusting to these situations can be the difference between steady profit and bankroll stagnation. When three or more opponents see the flop, hand ranges become much wider, and your edges may hinge on subtle factors like perceived range strength, stack depths, and willingness to semi-bluff.

The most important change in strategy for multi-way pots is to remain flexible and evaluate the likelihood of facing raises behind you. Paying attention to the playing styles of each opponent (loose-aggressive, tight-aggressive, or otherwise) can substantially influence whether to semi-bluff immediately or to adopt a more passive line that sets up larger implied odds later. By weighing these variables, you can identify the spots where an aggressive action might shut out worse draws or force folds from marginal made hands.

Solver-Based Insights and Position Leverage

Modern solver analysis supports a nuanced view of multi-way strategy. In contrast to classic heads-up solver models, multi-way simulations account for overlapping ranges and unpredictable post-flop dynamics. According to many solver outputs, the efficiency of a semi-bluff depends heavily on position. Acting first in a multi-way pot can diminish your ability to realize your draw’s equity if raises come in behind you. Conversely, having the button in a multi-way pot can boost your expected value, since you gain immediate information from everyone else’s decisions before you act.

Position also matters because it affects your ability to plan ahead. If your bet gets called in several spots, you still hold the advantage of seeing what opponents do on the turn. Meanwhile, out-of-position players must reveal their intentions early, opening them to isolation raises or awkward check-calls. Solver-based data underscores that fully optimizing your strategy requires careful assessment of each opponent’s range, stack, and likely actions, especially when your hand relies on hitting draws at the right price.

FAQ

What is a drawing hand in poker?

A drawing hand is one that needs to improve to become a potential winner. Common examples include four-card flush draws or open-ended straight draws.

How does position influence the profitability of a draw in multi-way pots?

Position lets you observe how others act before you make your decision. By acting later, you gain clarity on whether the pot is getting raised or if players are calling, which improves your ability to weigh pot odds and implied odds.

Why should I sometimes fold a strong draw against multiple opponents?

Folding a strong draw in a multi-way pot can be correct when the likelihood of a bigger draw dominating you is high or if you anticipate costly future action that ruins your odds. Solvers often show that facing a raise and re-raise with a non-nut draw is a dangerous spot.

When is it advantageous to bet a draw on the flop in a multi-way scenario?

It can be advantageous when you believe a semi-bluff has enough fold equity to steal the pot outright, or when building a larger pot creates profitable implied odds if you do get called and hit.

Does solver analysis apply well to multi-way pots with unpredictable opponents?

Solver analysis provides a roadmap for theoretically optimal play, but real-world dynamics can differ. In less predictable games, you might deviate from solver suggestions if you have accurate reads on players who make unorthodox moves.

What are the risks of check-raising out of position with a draw?

A check-raise can commit you to a larger pot with no guarantee of success. If an opponent moves all-in or calls and you miss on the turn, you may have to continue out of position with limited equity or fold after investing significant chips.

How does the original pre-flop raiser affect the way you play draws post-flop?

The original raiser’s range is often stronger, so you must gauge whether he’s likely to continue betting. If you suspect a raise behind you, proceeding aggressively can backfire. Conversely, if you believe the raiser might play passively, you can capitalize on your draw by taking a more active betting line.

Related Articles: