Historical WSOP Poker Hands

-
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware
18+ | Play Responsibly | T&C Apply
-
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware

- Fact Checked by: PokerListings
- Last updated on: March 9, 2025 · 1 minutes to read
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 2018
$10,000 Main Event: Welcome to Cynn City – John Cynn vs. Tony Miles
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
John Cynn | 66.2% | 96.3% | 100% | 100% |
Tony Miles | 33.1% | 3.6% | 0 | 0 |
With 7,874 entries the 2018 WSOP Main Event was the biggest it had been in a long time. In fact it was the second-biggest Main Event of all time after the dazzling 8,773-player 2006 Main Event which was won by Jamie Gold for $12m. That meant the stakes were particularly high with $8.8m on the table for the winner and a record 1,182 spots in the money. The personal stakes were also even higher for two of the final-table’s participants – Joe Cada, who had won the 2009 Main Event and was back at the final table 9 years later, and John Cynn, who had amazingly bubbled the 2016 Main Event final table in 11th.
Calling himself “happy” when he busted in 11th Cynn said in his post-win interview that it felt different this time around even though he never expected to be there the first time, let alone again with a chance to win. After 10 hours of heads-up play and 199 hands against Tony Miles, it’s no wonder when the final hand came down Cynn was overwhelmed.
>> More on Poker Hand Rankings
Starting the final three behind Miles in the chip count Cynn took the lead after about 17 hands but lost it again as Miles eliminated Michael Dyer in third place. They then literally battled back and forth for the full 10 hours with neither really gaining much of an advantage. Just after 5 am though, relief came in the form of a huge flop for Cynn. Cynn raised to 9 million from the button with his K♣ J♣ and Miles reraised to 34 million from the big blind with the Q♣ 8♥.
Cynn called. With two kings on the flop Cynn was sitting pretty and things got better when Miles bet 32 million into him. Cynn called. The turn 8♦ gave Miles two pair and, in his esteem, enough to jam for his last 114 million. Despite having Miles dead to rights Cynn tanked for over a minute before he called. The meaningless 4♠ on the river became an empty footnote to history as John Cynn celebrated the 2018 Main Event with his family and friends on the rail.
As the prize pool was so inflated ($74,015,600) Cynn collected a dazzling $8.8m for the win even though the payouts scale had been stretched to an even bigger portion of the field. Miles also benefitted from the big bump as he pocketed $5m for second.
Former World Champ Joe Cada was the talk of the town when he final-table the Main Event for a second time but after he was eliminated in 5th on the second night of play it was anybody’s game. When Miles eliminated Cada on a flip (AK over TT) Miles had jumped into second place with 104m but still trailed chip leader Michael Dyer with 189m. As they played the next 119 hands to the elimination of Nicolas Mannion in fourth, Miles and Cynn had accumulated at the expense of Dyer, who dropped back to third to end the night.
In fact Dyer finished the night with just 26.2m which put him way behind Miles, who now held the lead with 238.9m and Cynn who had 128.7. When play resumed the following day Cynn chip up over the first 17 hands to take the lead before Miles bounced Dyer to set up the epic heads-up. With both players having boisterous rail the action was intense, too, as the chip lead changed hand 11 times over the course of the 10 hours. As Miles called it, it was a “war” with potential haymakers being thrown and avoided regularly.
Still, no one had gotten so far ahead of the other that it was a foregone conclusion who would win. On hand 409 of the final table Cynn had Miles on the edge of extinction with both all in on draws but a chopped pot brought them back to where they were. The end, then, was a bit anticlimactic. With a standard opening raise from Cynn Miles pushed back with a pretty big bet (34m) that was over the size of the pot or, as Phil Hellmuth said on the WSOP broadcast, “pulls the trigger on his jigginess.”
Miles then says, “I think I saw that card,” which was a bit confusing. Cynn thought for a bit before calling. On the flop Miles bet a smallish 32m and Cynn took his time calling even though he must have been ecstatic sitting with trips Kings. The brutal 8 on the turn set up Miles’ demise perfectly. He shoved and Cynn waited – although some say much too long – to think things through before calling. Miles suggested it was a slow play at the time but later apologized for it, saying he was caught up in the moment. Even though some say it was an insta-call, after 10 hours and almost 200 hands Cynn was clearly spent and was just taking his time to think things through before making the biggest call of his life.
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 2017
$10,000 Main Event: Blum Goes the Dynamite – Scott Blumstein vs. Dan Ott
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scott Blumstein | 22.9% | 13.9% | 7% | 100% |
Dan Ott | 56.6% | 71.1% | 92.9% | 0 |
When you win the WSOP Main Event championship by hitting a three-outer on the river, it’s always going to be a memorable finish and one you’ll recount over and over again. In the case of Scott Blumstein‘s dramatic capper, though, it wasn’t quite the heartwrenching suckout it might seem at first.
First, Blumstein had been the dominant chip leader for the final three and wasn’t at risk of losing his chip lead should he lose the hand. And it was his heads-up opponent, Dan Ott, that was at risk when the two got it all in for the final hand. After Blumstein limped from the button with the A♥ 2♦ Ott raised to 8m with his A♦ 8♦.
Blumstein put him to the test by shoving and Ott called his last 55m in chips off at risk of elimination. When the cards were flipped he was at least relieved to see he was ahead. The J♠ 6♠ 5♥ helped even further as it inched his lead up and took away a few chop outs.
The 7♥ turn was even more comforting, adding a straight draw to Ott’s holdings and virtually ensuring he would double up and inch back into the heads-up match further.
As anyone who plays poker knows, though, it ain’t over until that final card hits the felt and for Ott it was a stunner – the 2♥ to give Blumstein the WSOP championship. Blumstein’s rail erupted and the online poker from Brigantine, NJ was etched in the WSOP history books.
Blumstein’s final take was $8,150,000 for first place to go along with the iconic bracelet and trophy. Ott, much like the previous year’s runner-up, Gordon Vayo, had to settle for $4.7m – still a dazzling score for a 25-year-old.
Scott Blumstein had come to the final table of the WSOP Main Event as the chip leader of the final nine (97.2m) and by the time there were just three players left for the second session had increased it substantially (226m). Second-place Dan Ott had 88m (up from 18m to start the final table) and third-place Benjamin Pollak 46m. Pollak had impressed many with his play at the final table and was certainly a fan favorite despite the small stack and although Blumstein had still more or less led wire-to-wire.
After a slow first two hours Blumstein had extended his lead slightly to 269m when Ott and Pollak got it all in with a standard coin flip. Ott had AQ and Pollak had eights; Ott doubled to 68 million and Pollak dropped to 24m. Pollak then doubled up vs. Blumstein, dropped another all in to Ott, tripled up then was busted in a three-way all in that left Blumstein with 232m and Ott 128m to start heads-up.
Blumstein pulled away from Ott fairly quickly though and after about 65 hands Ott was down to around 10 BB. He then doubled up with K9 vs. Blumstein’s 66 (a 9 hit the flop). Rather than trigger a comeback, however, in just a couple more hands it was all over thanks to the 3-outer. While Ott was obviously disappointed, given how far he had laddered up from the start of the final table – and that it was his first-ever Main Event – he certainly could live with his final payout ($4.7m).
Blumstein’s payout was $8.1m and, truthfully, befit the play of a guy who came in with a big stack and knew how to wield it properly. It was his first time ever playing the WSOP Main Event and, while his play was solid, he knew he hadn’t necessarily changed the course of his own poker history too much:
“I don’t have an ego in this game,” he told the WSOP. “I know where I stand. I know two weeks ago I was just a New Jersey online grinder and nothing’s really changed […] This is just one poker tournament. It takes variance and luck and playing your best. And all those things came together … feel pretty fortunate throughout the whole tournament to have a big stack. That’s what the Main Event allows you to do […] I definitely think having a big stack allows you put pressure on and increases your chances of winning.”
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 2016
$10,000 Main Event: Vayo Con Dios – Qui Nguyen vs. Gordon Vayo
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Qui Nguyen | 68.9% | 68.6% | 81.9% | 100% |
Gordon Vayo | 29.3% | 29.2% | 18.1% | 0 |
Gordon Vayo started the heads-up portion of the 2016 WSOP Main Event final table with a 200m-136m chip lead but Qui Nguyen‘s aggressive, unpredictable play fairly quickly turned the tide.
His repeated aggression and Vayo’s methodical style had them flip positions within 30 minutes. Vayo took the lead back and they battled back and forth fairly evenly for another hour or so.
Then Nguyen hit the gas. Getting a big fold from Vayo on the river in an 80m-chip pot, Nguyen took a big leap forward and kept going. In another hour Nguyen a substantial 282m-54m lead before play slowed and they played some small ball.
After 100+ hands it had become one of the longest heads-up matches in WSOP Main Event history. Vayo doubled up a couple of times to make it closer but Nguyen had then again eroded him back down to around 54m.
For the final nail in the coffin Nguyen raised to 8.7m on the button with K♣ T♣ and Vayo shoved with J♠ T♠. He was dominated. The percentages didn’t change too much on the K♦ 9♣ 7♦ flop as Nguyen hit top pair but Vayo added a double gutshot.
The turn 2♠ swung things back heavily to Nguyen and the 3♥ finished it off. All told the heads-up ran 181 hands and lasted 7 hours. The former Baccarat pro claimed the 2016 WSOP Main Event championship and pocketed $8,005,310 (before taxes, of course). Amazingly, Nguyen’s previous best live tournament cash for for just $9,029. Vayo’s runner-up check tallied $4,661,228.
This Main Event heads-up was a dramatic clash in styles between the reckless amateur Nguyen and the controlled, methodical play of a veteran online grinder in Vayo. Critics (and even Vayo himself, retrospectively) said Vayo played way too conservatively in trying to keep the pots small and ultimately use his skill edge to his advantage. The pressure of the final table stage also played a factor for Vayo, as he told PokerListings:
“It’s definitely surreal looking back at. It was a one-in-a-lifetime experience. Obviously for like six months after the final table I didn’t go a day without thinking about how it all played out. It was such a huge stage that it was definitely devastating at the time but you start to come to terms with the fact it was basically one final table and one heads-up match basically. You can’t get too hard on yourself. There were a few hands I [regretted].
“People were very critical of my overall strategy and I actually think my strategy was pretty sound. I just failed to execute on a couple specific hands that really made the difference … The pressure was absolutely fucking insane. I had my whole family and friends there. It might have affected me a little bit. I knew if I made a huge mistake I’d never be able to live with myself and that might have hindered me heads-up a little bit … There were two or three hands where I definitely should have called. It’s just one of those things.”
>> More on Poker Hand Rankings
A year later the four-month break for the November Nine ended, which Vayo said also might have changed how things ended up.
“I was so exhausted … It’s tough to say. The variables of playing the Main Event final table are just so different. You build up hours of intuition in certain environment and then you go to the final table and it’s not even remotely close. It’s an entirely different experience.”
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 2015
$10,000 Main Event: Joe McKeehen in God Mode – Joe McKeehen vs. Josh Beckley
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Mckeehan | 47% | 91% | 95% | 100% |
Josh Beckley | 53% | 9% | 5% | 0 |
The last hand of the 2015 WSOP Main Event played itself. Joshua Beckley found pocket fours with just 11% of the chips. Joe McKeehen had a definite calling hand heads-up with A-T and 89% of the chips in front of him.
Antonio Esfandiari was commentating and summed it up pretty well: “There is almost no version of [McKeehen] not hitting the flop the way he’s been running.”
A ten came in the door. There were no backdoor outs for Beckley and he couldn’t find another four. Like it has so often in the past, the Main Event was decided by a coin flip.
Fun fact: On Day 6 Beckley had McKeehen on the ropes with McKeehen all-in with A-Q vs Beckley’s A-K on a K-J-x flop. But McKeehen hit one of the four tens on the river for Broadway.
It wasn’t one of the most exciting final tables in the history of the WSOP and that was partly because of what had happened the day before. The new rising star, Fedor Holz, busted in 25th then Justin Schwartz, who would have been the perfect “bad guy” in the final, finished 14th.
Finally, Daniel Negreanu, one of the most famous poker players ever, ended up in 11th for the second time in his career, astoundingly. So, like the years before, the final table was mostly made up of young professionals who hadn’t caught too much attention yet.
There were a couple of names that stood out and made it more interesting. Max Steinberg, a former bracelet winner, had already had a deep run in the main event the year before. Neil Blumenfield, from San Francisco and 61 years old, was a total dark horse. And then there was Pierre Neuville.
The 72 year old Belgian pro, EPT Serial Qualifier and former PokerStars team pro was by far the most successful finisher at the WSOP with 19 ITM finishes before this final table.
Yet, with everybody’s darling (Negreanu) and the perfect villain (Schwartz) missing, the audience was left with McKeehen, who had more than twice the chips of the player in second, several shortstacks who didn’t dare to play, and Zvi Stern, who had mainly made a name of himself by his excessive tanking.
It was also the most dominant performance since Jaime Gold in 2006. Three of the last four players who came to the final table with 30% of the chips won – Greg Raymer, Gold, and Jonathan Duhamel – with Darvin Moon finishing second. So McKeehen was not a surprise winner, obviously.
However, he was always so far ahead that no other player at the table even got to the number of chips McKeehen had when the final started. The most impressive performance at this table was probably the one of runner-up Beckley, who was last in chips when the two shortest stacks had gone and then moved all the way up to 2nd.
Along the way he made the best laydown of the final when, during 4-handed play, he 3-bet with pocket jacks against a raise of McKeehen and then laid them down when McKeehen 4-bet. McKeehen had queens.
The heads-up only lasted 12 hands and it ended the way everyone had expected. To give you an expression of how things went for McKeehen: If you look for “The sickest run ever” on YouTube, you find Joe McKeehen. The video covers McKeehen hands only from Day 5 and it’s still over an hour long.
That being said, McKeehen did play exceptionally well. He didn’t just get hit by the deck; he also did the right thing almost every hand he played. One year after the top three players of the Main Event were Europeans, this final was once again an American business and they finished in all of the top four spots.
When McKeehen and Beckley went heads-up McKeehen had 155.65 million or 81% of the chips. Beckley had 37 million or 11%. It was also Beckley’s first time in the Main Event and he needed to find a double up quickly.
However, from the first heads-up hand when McKeehen got A-K vs Beckley’s 9-7 on an A-K-T flop, it didn’t look like Beckley could overcome the 4-1 chip deficit. Beckley had only won three of the 11 hands heads-up and none of the pots were big. He tried various strategies from limping to 3-betting, but every time he got outplayed by McKeehen.
McKeehen caught A-K twice, pocket tens, and flopped trips during the heads-up, which didn’t hurt, but he was also spot on with his reads on Beckley. When Beckley found 4♦ 4♣ he was down to 19 big blinds (19.4 million chips), which is pretty much the ideal size for a push.
McKeehen found A♥ T♦, which heads-up and with a now more than 7-1 chip advantage, he correctly considered good enough for a call. The first of the community cards was a ten and the board ran out without any flush or straight draws, making Joe McKeehen the new World Champion.
Which proves, we guess, the old poker saying “To win tournaments, you have to flip well.”
McKeehen God Mode
“God mode” here doesn’t mean that McKeehen just got lucky all the time. Neither does it mean that he simply won all the coin flips. Much more, McKeehen rarely even had to get lucky. He busted five players at the final table before the heads-up, and these are the hands that were played.
— In the 2nd hand of the final table McKeehen pushed all-in from the button with A-4. Patrick Chan called in the big blind with K-Q and found no help on the board; pre-flop equity 58% – 42%.
— When Federico Butteroni pushed his small stack all-in with A-J, McKeehen found A-K; pre-flop equity 71% – 24%.
— McKeehen raised with J♥ 6♥ and then called Pierre Neuville’s all-in who had A♣ J♣. This was the only time McKeehen was dominated in an all-in. McKeehen hit runner runner flush. Pre-flop equity 27% – 71%.
— When Max Steinberg went all-in with A-J, McKeehen called with A-Q. Pre-flop equity 71% – 23%.
— When Neil Blumenfield moved all-in with 2-2, McKeehen had Q-Q. Pre-flop equity 81% – 18%.
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 2014
$10,000 Main Event: Sometimes the Better Hand Wins – Martin Jacobson vs. Felix Stephensen
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Martin Jacobson | 69% | 99.5% | 100% | 100% |
Felix Stephensen | 31% | 0.5% | 0 | 0 |
It was going to be a first in many ways – either Norway or Sweden would get the World Championship of Poker for the very first time. Felix Stephensen was playing Martin Jacobson heads-up. In fact the third-place finisher, Jorryt van Hoof from the Netherlands, completed the first 1-2-3 finish for Europeans in the WSOP ME. This was also the first – and to date the only – time the winner got guaranteed prize money of $10,000,000. As the pay jumps were incredibly high towards the top the WSOP has refrained from guaranteeing that kind of money again.
In the last hand Stephensen had only 28.5 million chips to Jacobson’s 172 million. The Norwegian found A♥ 9♥ which, heads-up, is one of the stronger hands. With the big blind at 1.6 million plus a 200,000 ante Stephensen raised and then called when his Swedish counterpart moved all-in on him. Of course, the Norwegian would have loved to see a lower pair so that he was at least flipping, but he was still not in terrible shape holding 31% equity.
The flop, however, turned out to be pretty much the worst that could happen to him. A ten in the door meant that very likely all the other board cards would be meaningless and in fact they turned out to be. The complete board ran T♣ 9♣ 3♠ – K♦ – 4♣ and Martin Jacobson became the deserved winner of the most important event the poker world knows. Fun fact: With play still 5-handed all the chips of Stephensen and Jacobson had gone into the middle when Stephensen held pocket sevens and Jacobson had A-9. Stephensen hit a set on the flop.
Rarely has there been so much consent about the winner being the worthy champion. Although Martin Jacobson had never won a big tournament before he already had several EPT final tables under his belt and had been a serious contender in a lot of big events. If anything people were saying that he might be a little too quiet for an ambassador. Jacobson was the first Swede since Chris Bjorin in 1997 to make the final table. Jacobson was second to Bjorin on the Swedish money list prior to this event.
Bruno Politano was the first Brazilian to make the final table but maybe the most amazing story of this final table was Mark Newhouse. The American player made the November Nine for the second time in a row, finishing ninth in 2013. The last player to achieve this was “Action Dan” Harrington who had sat at the final table when Moneymaker won and the year after when Greg Raymer took it down. However the fields had been considerably smaller in 2003/2004. When Newhouse made it through fields of 6,352 and 6,683 players it was considered a much more difficult feat. Before the final table started Newhouse said that the only thing he now dreaded was finishing in ninth place again, which was exactly what happened.
Having only 12 big blinds left Stephensen decided not to push his A-9 but only raise it to 3.5 million (big blind = 1.6 million). Usually you would say this is the wrong play but Stephensen had good reason to play his hand that way. Although the two had only played 30 hands heads-up this was hand number 327 at this final table so the two had clashed with each other a lot.
At the beginning of the heads-up Jacobson held a lead of 142 million to 58.5 million but then consecutively chipped away at Stephensen’s stack. It went down unusually as Stephensen had actually won more hands than the Swede but Jacobson had taken all the big ones. Stephensen saw a good chance to double up here. When he puts in the raise of 2.25x he has no intention of folding anymore.
Being aware that Jacobson might put pressure on him with any two he knows he’s going to put all his chips in whatever happens. In case Jacobson just calls Stephensen is probably going to move in on any flop. Against Jacobson’s pushing range his A-9 suited is good most of the time and, of course, he also has some fold equity.
Jacobson on the other hand doesn’t need to push his pocket tens at all, at first glimpse. His hand is a monster in heads-up play and your initial reaction could be to think he should have played them slower. But Jacobson has something else on his mind. He over-pushes the tens to make his hand look weaker than it is. Although there is some chance that Stephensen folds it is not very likely and against Stephensen’s calling range Jacobson’s tens are way ahead.
Only when the cards are turned over can we see that Jacobson has almost 70% of the winning equity, but both players played their hands well. As we know the tens held up in the end, but such is poker: Sometimes the better hand wins.
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 2013
$10,000 Main Event: Riess the Beast – Jay Farber vs. Ryan Riess
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ryan Riess | 65% | 86% | 93% | 100% |
Jay Farber | 35% | 14% | 7% | 0 |
Ryan Riess – “The Beast,” as his rail called him in their chants – was 23 when he won the biggest poker tournament in the world. It was the sixth time in a row that the champion was a professional player in his early 20s. Ten years after Chris Moneymaker’s legendary victory Riess was, however, the first WSOP champ who said that it was actually Moneymaker who inspired him to start playing. And it was his first time in the Main Event.
Having made the November Nine he announced in July that he would win it and when he actually did he said he was the best player in the world. This didn’t go over well within the poker community as it came across rather pretentious. It might have even cost him a generous sponsorship contract.
With JC Tran coming into the final as chipleader and David “Raptor” Benefield at the table – and a certain Carlos Mortensen missing the final by just one spot – the community felt that the two heads-up players Riess and Jay Farber weren’t exactly the best at the table. However, the community probably didn’t do Riess justice. Having made a living as a supermarket cashier and a parking booth attendant, the former poker dealer had worked his way up all by himself and deserved to be where he was.
In the final hand of the tournament Riess opened 2.5x with the big blind at 1,000,000 chips. Farber moved all-in with his 14 million remaining chips and Riess insta-called. Farber knew he wouldn’t be good with his Q♠ 5♠ and indeed Riess tabled A♥ K♥. The flop was a disaster for Farber. The J♦ T♦ 4♣ board took away his queens as outs so he fell from 35% to 14% equity.
The turn 3♣ had this number drop to 7% and the river 4♦ was close but no five so Farber had to settle for second place. Ryan Riess had conquered the poker Olympus and won $8,361,570. However, there were bigger stories that year at the WSOP. Daniel Negreanu became the first player to win the WSOP POY title for a second time. Steve Gee, having made the November Nine the year before at the age of 57, came back to finish in 24th place, bringing back memories of Greg Raymer’s famous second run at the title.
And then there was Mark Newhouse, who eventually busted in ninth place. That was not a story yet but it would become one the following year.
As Farber had been down to 14 bb there wasn’t much room for him to maneuver. However, when they had begun their heads-up 90 hands earlier, it was Farber who had the 105 million to 85 million chiplead.
Slowly but surely, Riess had chipped away at Farber’s stack, showing that little more aggression that is so crucial in heads-up poker. Forty hands before the last, Riess had Farber already down to 20 million and he had barely clung on. Only Riess had also won nine of the last 12 hands and Farber was switching gears, having shoved in two out of the previous three hands.
Farber finally tried to get his chips back by firing but by that time Riess only had to wait for a proper hand to pick him off. He was lucky enough to get that hand quickly … but then the Main Event champion is always one of the luckier players in this tournament.
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 2012
$10,000 Main Event: King Merson – Greg Merson vs. Jesse Sylvia
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Greg Merson | 54.6% | 75.7% | 86.4% | |
Jesse Sylvia | 44.7% | 24.3% | 13.6% |
Two out of the three top stories of the 2012 Main Event had ended right before the November Nine were found. French pro player Gaelle Baumann and Norwegian waitress Elisabeth Hille had been the center of attention as they were promising female players to reach the final table, but then unluckily finished in 11th and 10th place. The third big story was the one about the eventual champion Greg Merson, who’d just recently overcome his drug addiction and literally treated the WSOP as a personal cure.
Merson had also just won the $10k NLHE 6-max Championship and his first bracelet two days before the Main Event started. But let’s go to the action of the final hand. With 400 hands played this became the longest final table in the history of the Main Event. The blinds were 1m/2m/300k and Merson put in a raise to four million. 2012 was also the year in which the 2x pre-flop raise had become more fashionable than 2.5x or 3x raise. At this moment they entered their 13th hour of play and Sylvia 3-bet to 9.5 million. The pot had already grown to 14.4 million but Merson decided to put Sylvia to the test.
He moved all-in with his remaining 70 million and Sylvia took several minutes to come to a decision. Eventually he made the call and not only Sylvia’s coach Vanessa Selbst looked on incredulously when he showed Q♠ J♠. Merson’s hand was K♦ 5♦, not exactly a monster either, but these two hands generated a 140-million chip pot. With heaps of chips in the middle the flop was dealt 6♣ 3♥ 9♦, giving neither player even a part of a piece. The turn 6♠ kept Merson’s king in the lead and gave Sylvia no additional outs. He had exactly six of them – all the queens and jacks – to stay in the match.
The river was the 7♣ and with just king-high (discounting the pair on the board), Greg Merson won the World Championship title and $8,531,853.
In hand #400 of this final table we’re looking at two players who must be exhausted, although that doesn’t mean at all that they played this hand poorly. In heads-up play in 2012 it was normal to raise over 90% of your hands in position and Merson does so accordingly. Holding K-5 suited at a full-ring table would be rather marginal but in heads-up its value is a lot higher. Indeed Jesse Sylvia holds a weaker hand but only by a slight touch. His re-raise serves to either win the pot right there or to possibly represent a strong hand post-flop.
>> More on Poker Hand Rankings
Also, Q-Js looks like a very good hand heads-up. Sylvia figures he has a good chance to make top pair, and actually he could. But Merson decides not to play the flop here. After Sylvia’s raise his K-5s doesn’t look that good anymore. Being the chipleader, though, Merson is sure he can push Sylvia off a lot of hands as his opponent would always have to make a decision for the whole championship to call. So he maximizes the pressure and let’s Sylvia think about it. That’s what Sylvia does, and he’s on a pretty good track.
Although it eventually turns out when the hands were flipped over that Sylvia’s hand is a little weaker than Merson’s, it’s not the same if you look at the range Sylvia has to put Merson on. Apart from some ace- or king-high hands where Sylvia is actually behind or even dominated, there are all the middle and low pairs in Merson’s range and against these Sylvia would be flipping. After so many hours of play a flip probably doesn’t sound so bad.
But Merson also has a lot of junk hands in his range that are worse than Sylvia’s and where Merson would only exert pressure with the larger stack. So, although Sylvia has often been blamed in the aftermath for making a bad call, it’s not actually. His Q-J is ahead of a large part of Merson’s range and only a 45-55 underdog to his actual hand.
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 2011
$10,000 Main Event: Pius and the Sunshine Band – Pius Heinz vs. Martin Staszko
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pius Heniz | 61.8% | 71.8% | 77.3% | 100% |
Martin Staszko | 38.2% | 28.2% | 22.7% | 0 |
It had been a memorable final table with five of the last nine players coming from Europe. Two of which outlasted the whole field of 6,865. Pius Heinz from Germany, who’d come in seventh in chips, was battling it out against Czech Martin Staszko, who’d started the last day as chipleader. Staszko had a 117m-89m chip lead over Heinz after he’d busted the last American, Ben Lamb, in third place. The final battle would go over 120 hands.
The German won the majority of the pots but kept on losing big ones, so the score was pretty even for most of the time. Then, in a 170m-chip hand — in fact the biggest pot of the tournament — Heinz doubled into a commanding lead. Only eight hands later Staszko open-shoved 39.5 million – equaling 16 big blinds – with T♣ 7♣ and Heinz quickly called after finding A♠ K♣. Although Heinz has one of the top starting hands in Texas Hold’em here the odds are only 62-38 in his favor.
The flop fell 9♠ 5♣ 2♦ and missed both players about as far as possible. Heinz now had 72% equity. On the turn J♥ Staszko found a couple of more outs. Apart from sevens and tens he was now also drawing for an eight which would give him a straight. However Heinz’ equity had risen to 77%. The river was the 4♦, making for a very unspectacular board to end a spectacular tournament.
Pius Heinz became the first ever player from Germany to win the biggest title in poker – and $8.715.638. He was also the second youngest WSOP champion. In the wake of this victory Heinz went on to win an EPT side event only six weeks after. Later, he reverted to high-stakes cash games and, after his sponsoring contract ended, he pretty much disappeared from the poker scene in 2013.
There’s not really much to analyze here. Staszko open-shoves with his mediocre T♣ 7♣, hoping to steal the big blind and ante from Heinz. He’s not looking for a call and with a 16 bb stack he can still make Heinz fold a significant range of hands. However Heinz finds one of the top five starting hands – A♠ K♣ – and snap-calls the Czech’s all-in.
The board runs out without any of the players coming even close to hitting it and when the river falls Heinz vanishes into the crowd of his fans. With all of them wearing the white hoodie that had become Heinz’ trademark, and by chanting Heinz’ name continuously to the tune of KC and the Sunshine Band’s Give It Up, they surely had their share in making this a memorable main event.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2010
$10,000 Main Event: Canada Plants Its Flag – Jonathan Duhamel vs. John Racener
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jonathan Duhamel | 60.5% | 76.7% | 86.4% | 100% |
John Racener | 39.1% | 22.4% | 13.6% | 0 |
Jonathan Duhamel rolled into the 2010 WSOP Main Event as the overall chip leader and a serious contender to win the tournament. Despite running into trouble in the middle of the final table Duhamel successfully recovered and had an overwhelming chip lead on John Racener by the time heads-up play began.
In the final hand Duhamel open-shoved for the umpteenth time and Racener finally decided to make a stand with K♦ 8♦ only to find out he was up against A♠ J♥. Racener didn’t even get the whiff of a draw as the board bricked out and made Duhamel the first Canadian winner in the history of the WSOP Main Event.
Not a ton going on as Racener only had 14.95 million chips to work with and the blinds had reached 800,000/1,600,000. Duhamel was very aggressive at the final table and calling an all-in shove with K♦ 8♦ was probably fine.
It was a pretty tough task for Racener right from the beginning as the heads-up match began with Duhamel at 188,950 chips to Racener’s 30,650. You wonder what might have happened if Racener was more active three-handed but the $5.5 million he received for second place was a considerable consolation prize.
Of course Duhamel received one of the biggest payouts ever at the WSOP for $8.9 million.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD*EM WSOP 2009
$10,000 Main Event: Cada Flips the Switch – Joe Cada vs. Darvin Moon
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Cada | 51.6% | 78.1% | 86.4% | 100% |
Darvin Moon | 48% | 21.9% | 13.6% | 0 |
The 2009 WSOP Main Event final table was a weird one. Joe Cada came into the final table fifth in chips and was a bit of a sleeper for the first part of the playdown leaving most of the heavy action to Darvin Moon and Phil Ivey.
Finally Cada woke up when action got down to five players and recorded several pivotal double ups. Cada then busted Antoine Saout (who many thought played the best at the final table) in third place to set up a heads-up battle against logger Darvin Moon.
Cada entered heads-up with a 135,950,000 chip-advantage over Moon’s 58,850,000. Moon quickly took the chip lead but Cada battled back and eventually grabbed the lead for good.
Finally, after 88 hands of play, Moon had had enough of Cada’s aggression and called all-in for one hell of a coin flip
This is a basic coin-flip situation but it’s interesting to look at how they got there. Moon played fairly ABC poker for most of the final table but at a certain point he’d had enough.
It was likely after the 346th hand of the final table where Cada successfully called for his tournament life with two-pair. Moon only had an open-ended straight draw and missed his outs.
Moon seemed deflated by the hand and you wonder if it affected his judgement in the final hand. With Cada holding the chip lead he decided to move all-in with pocket nines after a 3-bet from Moon. Moon moved all-in with king-queen suited and Cada double-checked his cards once and called.
It was fairly standard action from Cada but probably a sub-optimal play from Moon. They had been playing a long time at this point, however, so that also could have played a part. By winning the 2009 WSOP Cada became the youngest world champion in poker history.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2008
$10,000 Main Event: Final Hand – Peter Eastgate vs. Ivan Demidov
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Eastgate | 62.5% | 31.5% | 90.9% | 100% |
Ivan Demidov | 36.9% | 68.5% | 9.1% | 0 |
The 2008 WSOP Mai
n Event was an historic tournament. It was the first time a final table had ever been delayed four months, and it was the first time a Dane would walk away from Vegas a World Champion.
Nearly 16 weeks after the Main Event reached the final table, the final nine players returned from their homes around the world. Each had his eyes on the bracelet and the $9.1 million first-place prize, but only Denmark’s Peter Eastgate would be successful.
The first seven players fell, and when the heads-up match began, Eastgate held a healthy lead with $79.5 million to the $57,725,000 of Russia’s Ivan Demidov. Eastgate battered his opponent and laid claim to more than $120 million of the $136.8 million in play before the final hand began.
Eastgate limped in on the button and Demidov checked in the big blind. The flop came down K32 and Demidov checked. Eastgate fired $1.25 million and Demidov made the call.
The turn was the 4. Demidov checked again and Eastgate continued his aggression, firing a second barrel worth $2 million. Demidov check-raised to $6 million and Eastgate just called.
The river was the 7 and Eastgate moved in. Demidov snap-called and turned over 4-2 for two pair. He must have thought he was good but Eastgate showed A5 for the wheel straight that got there on the turn.
Demidov was out in second for $5,809,545 while Peter Eastgate became the youngest World Champion in history, pocketing $9,152,416!
When this hand began, Eastgate was the prohibitive chip leader, and opted to limp in from the button. With such a big lead and an ace in his hand, it’s almost certain Eastgate was looking to get it all-in before the flop should the short-stacked Russian raise.
Demidov checked, however, and caught bottom pair on the flop. Eastgate continuation bet the flop, which he would likely have done whether he missed or not.
Knowing this, Demidov smooth-called to see if Eastgate would shut down on the turn. Fourth street was an absolute disaster for Demidov, making his two pair but giving Eastgate the wheel straight.
From here on the action is irrelevant as the money will go in every single time.
Eastgate fires again and gets a check-raise from his opponent. He opts to smooth-call just in case Demidov is willing to fold this late in the hand.
Just as expected, the money goes in on the river, with Demidov’s two pair losing out to the turned straight of Peter Eastgate.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2007
$10,000 Main Event: Silencing the Lam – Jerry Yang vs. Tuan Lam
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
JERRY YANG | 52.6% | 12% | 13.6% | 100% |
Tuan Lam | 47% | 88% | 86.4% | 0 |
Jerry Yang comes into the final table as one of the short stacks. He comes out fighting and quickly seizes the chip lead. Yang’s aggressive play also gives him a huge chip lead coming into heads-up play against Tuan Lam, holding 80% of the chips in play at around 102 million. Lam has 25.4 million. With the blinds at 400,000/800,000 and a 100,000 chip ante, Yang looks down at 8♦ 8♣ and makes a raise to 2.3 million. Lam looks down at A♦ Q♦ and moves all-in over the top. Yang takes a moment and finally calls the bet, putting Lam’s tournament life at stake. But when the flop comes down 5♠ Q♣ 9♣, Lam takes a stranglehold on the hand. Yang will need to catch one of the remaining eights or running cards to win. When the turn brings the 7♦, though, it adds four gutshot outs to Yang’s two remaining eights. The river brings the 6♥ and heartbreak for Tuan Lam, giving Yang a winning nine-high straight, the World Series of Poker Main Event bracelet and $8.25 million.
There was very little that could have been done about this hand. Yang makes a standard 3x the big blind with his 8♦ 8♣. Lam, knowing Yang has been playing very aggressively, has no choice but to move all-in with his short stack and A♦ Q♦. Once the flop comes down, Lam becomes a huge favorite. However, Yang gets lucky and catches two running cards to make a straight. The beat looks much worse than it actually was. When the money went in, Yang was only a slight favorite for the coin flip with his pocket pair.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2006
$10,000 Main Event: Talking Your Way to a Champion – Jamie Gold vs. Paul Wasicka
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jamie Gold | 28.6% | 86.5% | 95.5% | 100% |
Paul Wasicka | 71% | 13.5% | 4.5% | 0 |
Jamie Gold enters heads-up play with a monumental chip lead, having grabbed the chip lead early in the tournament and amassing chips the whole way. Coming into the heads-up match, Gold out-chips Paul Wasicka 4.5-1. After a few hands of heads-up, Wasicka has a stack of approximately 16.2 million, while Gold has a massive stack of around 73.9 million. The hand begins with blinds at 200,000/400,000 and a 50,000 ante. Gold completes from the button with Q♠ 9♣. Wasicka looks down at T♥ T♠ and raises to 1.3 million. Gold makes the call.
The flop comes down Q♣ 8♥ 5♥. Wasicka bets out 1.5 million. Gold calmly proclaims he is all-in. Wasicka tanks while Gold goes into one of his now infamous talks. Eventually Wasicka, believing Gold is on a draw, makes the call. When Gold turns up his pair of queens, the young phenom is down to two outs. The turn brings the A♦, and the 4♣ river card seals the deal. Gold is the new World Series of Poker Main Event champion and takes home $12 million and the prestigious Main Event bracelet.
Jamie Gold limps the button yet again; a very weak play, especially heads-up. If you have a hand worth playing you should definitely bring it in for a raise from the button. However, Gold elects to limp and Wasicka finds himself with a very good hand heads-up. His T♥ T♠ makes for an excellent raising hand and he makes it 1.3 million to go, around 3x the big blind. Gold makes his call with position and his huge chip stack and we see a flop. The Q♣ 8♥ 5♥ brings trouble for Wasicka, with an overcard to his tens. He makes a continuation bet of just over half the pot, 1.5 million.
Gold then overbets all-in. Just a few hands prior, a very similar hand had played out. In a three-way pot with Wasicka and Michael Binger, Gold limped the button and then overbet all-in after a bet from one of his opponents. Binger ended up calling with top pair, top kicker and Gold drew out to a straight. With this hand fresh in Wasicka’s mind, he knew Gold was capable of fast playing draws. The flop made quite a few draws possible. Thus Wasicka went with his read on Gold and eventually made the call. Unfortunately for him, Gold held a pair of queens and Wasicka was drawing very slim.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2005
$10,000 Main Event: From rags to riches – Joe Hachem vs. Steve Dannenmann
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Hachem | 26% | 83.3% | 93.2% | 100% |
Steve Dannenmann | 72.5% | 5% | 6.8% | 0 |
After seven days of playing, the following unfolded at the final table only about half an hour into the heads-up play: Hachem and Dannenmann had $40 million and $16.35 million in chips respectively at the beginning of this hand. The blinds were $150,000-$300,000 with a $50,000 ante! Steven Dannenmann raised to $700,000 with the A♠ 3♣ and Hachem made a seemingly loose call with the 7♣ 3♠. The flop came 4♦ 5♦ 6♥. Hachem checked his straight and Steven bet $700,000 into the pot. Hachem re-raised to $1,700,000 and Steven flat called holding only ace-high and an open ended straight draw. The turn was the A♠. Hachem bet out $2,000,000 and Steven raised to $5,000,000. Hachem went all-in and Steven instantly called. Steven was drawing to a tie with one of the three remaining sevens on the river. The river was the 4♣ and Joseph Hachem became the new World Champion, winning $7,500,000!
Raising with any ace in heads-up play is a good play but $700,000 is a small raise, indeed it was barely twice the big blind. With $1,050,000 in the pot and only $400,000 more to call, Hachem is getting the right price to call with any two cards, especially being the chip leader. Hachem correctly calls the raise and checks on the flop in an attempt to trap Dannenmann. Steven bets approximately half the pot thinking his ace-high might be the best hand; a reasonable bet even though the board is scary. Hachem decides not to slow play his straight any further and raises the pot another million. A good raise since there are quite a few free cards that can potentially hurt his hand (in reality he is in great shape but he doesn’t know that for sure). Dannenmann calls and the pot now holds $4,850,000, which is more than 25% of Steven’s total stack. The call indicates that Steven’s plan is to see if his ace-high is good or else he thinks he can outdraw if one of his straight cards hit, also an ace could potentially make him the best hand. Definitely a dangerous call but still reasonable.
>> More on Poker Hand Rankings
On the turn the A♠ hits and that ends up being a money card for Hachem. He leads out again with a $2,000,000 bet and Dannenmann, thinking his pair of aces is the best hand, raises to $5,000,000. This is a tough situation for Steven; on the one hand, his hand is not extremely strong and, on the other hand, the board is dangerous enough that he doesn’t want to allow Hachem to see the river too cheaply. The bet by Hachem is a very good move because it is small enough to allow Steven to think that he can raise Hachem off his hand by putting in a raise of $3,000,000. Of course, Hachem now set Dannenmann all-in and Dannenmann, who, in light of the fact that he was very much pot committed (50% of his original stack was in the pot) and quite possibly could have been holding the best hand, made the call. This last call by Dannenmann is a judgment call based less on pot odds and more on the likelihood of him having the best hand.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2004
$10,000 Main Event: Value-betting until the river – Greg Raymer vs. David Williams
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Greg Raymer | 69.8% | 66.4% | 79.5% | 100% |
David Williams | 29.8% | 31% | 20.5% | 0 |
After 6 days of straight playing, the final hand of the 2004 WSOP was played out. The two remaining players were online qualifier Greg “Fossilman” Raymer and 23-year old poker professional David Williams. Raymer was leading by about 2-to-1 with approximately $17,125,000 in chips against Williams’ $8,240,000, with blinds of $50,000-$100,000. Williams raised to $300,000 on the button holding the A♥ 4♠ and Raymer called from the big blind with the 8♠ 8♦. The flop came 4♦ 2♦ 5♠. Raymer checked and Williams instantly bet $500,000. Raymer took his time and then raised to $1,600,000. Williams quickly called his bet. The turn brought the 2♥. Raymer declared a bet of $2,500,000 and again Williams instantly called. The river was the 2♣, giving both players a full house. Raymer thought for a second before announcing he was all-in. For the first time in the hand, Williams also took at least a second or two before calling and flipped his hand face-up before Raymer had a chance to do so. Raymer looked down at Williams’ card and then flipped over the winning hand. One second later, he raised both his hands in the air and screamed out in joy. First place gave Greg Raymer $5,000,000 in prize money, the largest tournament prize ever won.
Pre-flop, both players played their hands according to regular poker theory. Raymer hit a nice flop and decided to check-raise the aggressive Williams, a smart play. A check-call would not be a preferred play here because there are many draws on the board and that would make it too cheap on Williams. Williams also correctly bet the flop, since he had a gut-shot straight draw and middle pair with top kicker. When he got check-raised, he should have either moved all-in or folded, rather than initiating a pattern of calling his short stack. Raymer correctly assumed he had the best hand all the way and was simply “value-betting” on every round, thus making Williams pay for trying to outdraw him.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM 2002
$10,000 Main Event: Semi-bluffing on the flop – Robert Varkonyi vs. Julian Gardner
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Robert Varkonyi | 61% | 66.2% | 75% | 100% |
Julian Gardner | 39% | 33.8% | 25% | 0 |
The blinds were $20,000-$40,000 and the ante $5,000 when the last hand of the tournament was played. Varkonyi had about a 6-to-1 chip lead going into this pot. Varkonyi raised $90,000 with the Q♦ T♠ and Gardner called with the J♣ 8♣. The flop came Q♣ 4♣ 4♠, giving Varkonyi top pair and Gardner a flush draw. Gardner checked and Varkonyi bet $50,000, a small bet. Gardner decided to move all-in with $765,000 on a semi-bluff. Varkonyi called. The flush came on the river, but the 10♣ gave Varkonyi a full house. Varkonyi won the title and $2,000,000 in prize money.
Gardner decided to bluff Varkonyi when the board didn’t look too scary and he had enough chips to make a substantial raise. If called he knows he is likely to have at least 9 outs to draw out with. But Varkonyi made a good call and his cards held up. Varkonyi won the title and $2,000,000 in prize money.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2001
$10,000 Main Event: Being overly aggressive – Carlos Mortensen vs. Phil Helmuth
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Carlos Mortensen | 74% | 85.7% | 81.8% | 100% |
Phil Helmuth | 26% | 14.3% | 18.2% | 0 |
When the final table was down to five players a big hand came up between the world champion from 1989 Phil Hellmuth and Carlos Mortensen. The blinds were $15,000-$30,000 and the ante was $6,000. Making the pot $75,000 before the cards were dealt. Hellmuth limped into the pot, Phil Gordon limped in from the button, Carlos Mortensen limped in from the small blind and Stan Schrier in the big blind checked. The four-way pot had $150,000 in it before the flop. The flop came down Q♠ 9♦ 4♠. Mortensen checked, Schrier checked, Hellmuth bet $60,000 (less then half of the pot), Gordon folded, Mortensen raised $200,000 and Schrier took about two minutes to fold because he hadn’t realized it was his turn to act. The pot now had $410,000 in it and Phil Hellmuth quickly announced that he was moving all-in with his last $900,000. Mortensen called and the hands were turned up on the table. Hellmuth held a Q-T and Mortensen had a Q-J, giving both players top pair but Hellmuth had the weaker kicker. At this moment Hellmuth had 3 outs to a T for a two pair to beat Mortensen. On the turn a J hit, giving Hellmuth an open-ended straight draw and Mortensen top two pair. The J helped Hellmuth because it gave him 8 new outs, but killed his 3 outs to the T. He needed an 8 or a K to hit on the river to make a straight. The A♠ came on the river and sent Phil Hellmuth out in fifth place.
Hellmuth’s first bet is a good bet and it is not big enough to make him pot committed, so he should be able to release the hand. When Hellmuth moved his chips all-in he could only beat a bluff or make Mortensen lay down the better hand. Since it was an unraised pot with four players, it is unlikely that Hellmuth’s hand is the best after he has been check-raised by Mortensen. Mortensen could hold any two pair, a set of 9’s or 4’s, AQ, KQ, QJ or the J♠ T♠ that would make him the favorite over one pair. Mortensen might have made the same play with the A♠ 9♠, a JT and any Q, in that case Mortensen might have folded, but that still doesn’t make Hellmuth’s play correct.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2001
$10,000 Main Event: Trapping with aces – Carlos Mortensen vs. Dewey Tomko
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Carlos Mortensen | 17.4% | 48.5% | 25% | 100% |
Dewey Tomko | 82.6% | 51.5% | 75% | 0 |
Carlos Mortensen had a 2-to-1 chip lead when he and Dewey Tomko played the last hand of the tournament. Mortensen raised to $100,000 with the K♣ Q♣ and Tomko flat-called with the A♠ A♥ in an attempt to trap Mortensen. The flop came J♦ T♣ 3♣ giving Mortensen two overcards, the nut straight-draw and a king-high flush draw. Mortensen bet out another $100,000 and Tomko raised $400,000. Mortensen responded by moving all-in on a semi-bluff and Tomko called with his remaining $1,500,000. Mortensen was drawing to nine clubs, three nines and one ace giving him 13 outs in total. The three on the turn killed his outs to the ace-high straight, but when the 9♦ hit on the river he made the nut-straight. The hand won Mortensen the title and $1,500,000 in prize money. This was the second time that Tomko finished second in the tournament.
Both players played their hands well in this pot. Even if Tomko would have moved all-in on the flop Mortensen would probably have called, having as many outs as he did. Once the flop came and Mortensen bet out, they were both more or less trapped into playing their hands for all their chips
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 2000
$10,000 Main Event: A kicker that got outkicked – Chris ‘Jesus’ Ferguson vs. TJ Cloutier
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chris Ferguson | 25.9% | 15.2% | 13.6% | 100% |
TJ Cloutier | 74.9% | 84.8% | 86.4% | 0 |
When T.J. Cloutier and Chris Ferguson began playing heads-up, Cloutier had $400,000 and Ferguson had $4,700,000. Cloutier actually managed to take the chip lead away from Ferguson, but Ferguson was back in the lead when the last hand of the tournament was played. Cloutier moved all-in with the A♦ Q♣ and Ferguson called him with the A♠ 9♣. The flop came 2♥ K♣ 4♥, giving no help to either player. The turn was the K♥ and on the river the 9♥ fell, giving Ferguson a pair of nines. Ferguson won the title and $1,500,000 in prize money.
Cloutier analyses this heads-up match in his book “Championship Tournament Practice Hands” co-written with Tom McEvoy. In his own words he felt that Ferguson was getting nervous because he was being outplayed by Cloutier and was likely to make a mistake on a hand. He made that mistake when he called Cloutier’s all-in bet before the flop with the A♠ 9♣, but got lucky and won the pot.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1999
$10,000 Main Event: The small pocket pairs – Noel Furlong vs. Alan Goehring
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Noel Furlong | 18.6% | 83.2% | 90.9% | 100% |
Alan Goehring | 81.4% | 16.8% | 9.1% | 0 |
Noel Furlong limped from the small blind with the 5♣ 5♦ and Goehring checked from the big blind holding the 6♥ 6♣. The flop came Q♠ Q♣ 5♠ and both players checked. On the turn the 2♠ hit. Goehring checked again and Furlong bet $150,000. Goehring raised $300,000 and Furlong moved all-in. Goehring called and realized he was drawing to only four outs (either a queen or a six). No help came for Goehring on the river and Furlong became the 1999 World Champion, winning $1,000,000 in prize money.
Goehring could have raised before the flop, but he would have been in trouble either way because Furlong would most likely have called. Furlong probably even calls an all-in bet in this spot.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1998
$10,000 Main Event: “I play the board” – Scotty Nguyen vs. Kevin McBride
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scotty Nguyen | 34.2% | 94.8% | 97.7% | 100% |
Kevin McBride | 65.8% | 5.2% | 2.3% | 0 |
When playing heads-up, Kevin McBride raised $50,000 with the Q♥ T♥ and Scotty Nguyen called with the J♦ 9♣. The flop came 8♣ 9♦ 9♥, giving Nguyen trip nines and McBride a gut-shot straight draw with two overcards. Nguyen checked and McBride bet $100,000 on a semi-bluff. After thinking for a while Nguyen called. The turn brought the 8♥, giving McBride a straight flush draw and Nguyen a full house. Only the J♥ could give McBride the best hand at this point. Nguyen checked and again McBride bet $100,000. Nguyen called and the river card was the 8♠, which made a full house on the board. Nguyen now bet out $310,000, which would put McBride all-in if he decided to call. Apparently Nguyen said to McBride while he was thinking, “You call, gonna be all over baby.” McBride answered, “I call. I play the board.” This hand won Nguyen the title and $1,000,000 in prize money.
When Nguyen check-calls a bet on both the flop and turn, McBride should have realized that he either held a nine or an eight. Nguyens big bet on the river is very good since the big bet made it look more like he was bluffing. But calling off all his chips in the hopes off splitting the pot was not a good move by McBride.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1997
$10,000 Main Event: Slow-playing a marginal hand – Stu Ungar vs. Mel Judah
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stu Ungar | 65.8% | 76.4% | 88.6% | 100% |
Mel Judah | 34.2% | 23.6% | 11.4% | 0 |
When the final table was down to three players (Stu Ungar, Mel Judah and John Strzemp) the following hand came up. Mel Judah made a $60,000 raise on the button with the 10♥ 9♣, Stu “The Kid” Ungar called from the small blind with the Q♦ J♣ and Strzemp folded in the big blind. The flop came J♥ 3♥ 10♦, giving Ungar top pair and Judah second pair. Ungar checked and Judah checked behind him. On the turn the 2♣ hit and Ungar bet $80,000 at the pot. Judah called the $80,000 and raised it another $162,000, putting himself all-in. Ungar thought for a while but called the $162,000 raise. When the hands were turned over everyone could see that Judah was drawing to 5 outs with only one more card to come. On the river the K♣ hit and sent Judah out in third place. Ungar eventually went on to win the tournament and his third $10,000 WSOP title.
Ungar set this hand up beautifully by gambling in a spot were he had a lot to win and not too much to lose. His check on the flop made Judah think there was a reasonable chance that he was either bluffing or drawing when he bet on the turn. It was this play that made Judah move in on the turn, although Judah might have done the same thing on the flop if Ungar had bet, but it is unlikely. Since Ungar had a lot of chips and knew that he had set up Judah to move in on the turn, his call on the turn was correct. Had Judah bet on the flop he most likely would have been able to get away from the hand without losing his whole stack.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1997
$10,000 Main Event: A stone cold bluff – Stu Ungar vs. Ron Stanley
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stu Ungar | 63% | 25.4% | 22.7% | |
Mel Judah | 37% | 74.6% | 77.3% |
It was down to the final four players in the tournament when the following happened. Ron Stanley limped from the small blind with the 9♦ 7♦ and the late poker legend Stu Ungar checked from the big blind with a Q♠ T♣. The flop came A♠ 6♠ 9♥, giving Stanley a pair of nines and no help for Ungar. Stanley checked and Ungar checked behind him. On the turn the 8♣ hit giving Stanley an open-ended straight draw to go with his nines and Ungar now had a gut-shot straight draw and two overcards to Stanley’s pair. If a T hit on the river Ungar would make a better pair than Stanley, but this card would also give Stanley a straight. In short Ungar needed a Q or a J to make the better hand. Stanley bet $25,000 and Ungar reraised him $60,000 on a semi-bluff, hoping Stanley would fold. Stanley went into the tank but finally called. The K♦ hit on the river, not helping either player but it was a scare card for Stanley since there were now two overcards on the board to his pair. There was about $200,000 in the pot after Stanley’s call. Stanley checked and Ungar bet $220,000 into the pot. Stanley thought for a while and then reluctantly folded. Ungar decided to show his bluff as he was collecting the pot. This made Stanley lose his confidence along with the chips lost in the pot.
Stu Ungar eventually won the tournament and became the only player ever to win the Big One three times.
Had Stanley bet on the flop it is likely that he would have won the pot right there. Instead he decided to trap Ungar with a weak hand or he didn’t know what to do with the hand. When Ungar raised on the turn Stanley should have moved all-in or folded. Either Ungar has him beat and then Stanley must try to outdraw him or he is bluffing. With so many straight draws and a flush draw on the board almost any card is a scare card for Stanley, so a call here is a bad move. It is worth to mention that Ungar had checked top pair on the flop a few times before this hand came up and then bet/raised on the turn. He had set Stanley up for this play. Ungar must have smelled weakness in Stanley on the turn and realized that he had a chance to bluff him on the river in case Stanley would check to him.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1997
$10,000 Main Event: A mistake or a great play? – Stu Ungar vs. John Strzemp
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stu Ungar | 34.8% | 34.8% | 42% | |
John Strzemp | 65.2% | 65.2% | 58% |
When the last hand came up between two-time World Champion Stu Ungar and John Strzemp, Ungar held a 4-to-1 chip advantage. Ungar raised to $40,000 with the A♥ 4♣ and Strzemp called with the A♠ 8♣. The flop came A♣ 5♦ 3♥, giving both players top pair. Strzemp had the lead with the better kicker but Ungar had a gut-shot straight draw to go with his pair. Strzemp bet $120,000 on the flop and Ungar thought for a while before he moved all-in. Strzemp called all-in. The turn brought the 3♦, giving Ungar 23 outs for a split pot and 7 outs to win. The 2♠ fell on the river, giving Ungar a 5-high straight, his third title and $1,000,000 in prize money.
When Ungar moved in on Strzemp he must have been thinking that Strzemp could have had a better ace than him, since there were no likely draws on the flop. But it wasn’t likely to have been a great ace like AK or AQ since he wasn’t reraised pre-flop. Because he had the chip lead he decided to move in hoping that Strzemp would fold a weak ace. If he was called and Strzemp held a hand like A8 or A7, Ungar still had about a 35% of drawing out. He didn’t risk too much here since they would be about even in chips had he lost the hand. Strzemp just got unlucky that Ungar drew out on him. This is how Ungar himself thought of his play in the tournament, “I played a perfect tournament. I’m not kidding you. If every hand from start to finish was filmed “every bet, every raise, even every fold” players would witness a classic performance. It was a no-limit hold’em clinic.”
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1996
$10,000 Main Event: Overplaying middle pair – Huckleberry Seed vs. Bruce Van Horn
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Huckleberry Seed | 33.1% | 83.9% | 75% | 100% |
Bruce Van Horn | 66.9% | 16.1% | 25% | 0 |
When the final hand came up, Huck Seed had the chip lead after doubling up with pocket Q’s against Van Horn’s AJ. In the final hand Van Horn raised with the K♣ 8♣ and Seed called with the 9♦ 8♦. The flop came 9♥ 8♥ 4♣, giving Seed top two-pair and Van Horn middle pair with an overcard. Seed bet out on the flop, Van Horn raised and Seed re-raised Van Horn all-in. Van Horn called. The A♣ hit on the turn, giving Van Horn nine outs to the nut flush, making it twelve outs in total. The 3♠ hit on the river and won Seed the title and $1,000,000 in prize money.
Van Horn seems to have played this hand too aggressively. He probably should have either flat called Seed on the flop or raised an amount that he could get away from in case Seed would come over the top. Seed wasn’t likely to be drawing when he bet out and then re-raised on the flop, it looked like he was trying to protect a made hand.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1995
$10,000 Main Event: Moving in with nothing – Dan Harrington vs. Howard Goldfarb
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dan Harrington | 47.2% | 81.7% | 93.2% | 100% |
Goldfarb | 52.8% | 18.3% | 6.8% | 0 |
When the final hand came up the blinds were $15,000-$30,000 with an ante of $3,000 and Dan Harrington had the chip lead. Howard Goldfarb raised $100,000 before the flop with the A♥ 7♣ and Harrington called with the 9♦ 8♦. The flop came 8♣ 2♣ 6♦, giving no help to Goldfarb and top pair to Harrington. Harrington checked, Goldfarb moved all-in with $617,000 and Harrington called without hesitation. The turn brought the Q♠ and the river was the Q♥, not helping either player. Harrington won the title and $1,000,000 in prize money.
Goldfarb tried a big bluff on the flop in a situation where he didn’t have any information on Harrington’s holding. He would only get called if beat. Had he checked the flop and moved in on the turn, Harrington would have had a very tough call to make. Great check and call by Harrington who must have known that Goldfarb was capable of moving in with nothing.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1994
$10,000 Main Event: A bad spot to bluff – Russ Hamilton vs. Hugh Vincent
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Russ Hamilton | 85% | 95.2% | 81.8% | 100% |
Hugh Vincent | 15% | 4.8% | 18.2% | 0 |
When it was down to heads-up play between Russ Hamilton and Hugh Vincent the following hand came up. Vincent had $1,600,000 in chips and Hamilton had $1,070,000. Hamilton, who held the Q♣ Q♠, raised $150,000 and Vincent called with a 10-9 off suit. The flop came Q♥ 6♦ 5♥, giving Vincent nothing and Hamilton top set. Hamilton checks and Vincent checked behind him. On the turn the 8♠ hits, giving Vincent a double-belly-buster straight draw (he makes the nut straight if a J or 7 hits on the river). Hamilton bets out $400,000 leaving $500,000 in front of him. When it is Vincent’s turn to act he decides to move all-in on a semi-bluff. Hamilton, who had more than half of his chips in the pot, called. The only hands that had him beat at that point are the 7-4 or 9-7 for a straight. On the river the board paired when the 8♣ hit, giving Hamilton a full house.
Vincent made a few questionable plays in this hand. First he called a big raise (about 10% of his chips) with the 10-9 off suit, this might be considered a mistake but not a huge one. Hamilton’s check on the flop is a good play and most likely set up the action on the turn. Although there is a straight draw and a flush draw out on the flop, with top set in this pot you have to gamble a little bit. Vincent’s check is a decent play, giving him the chance to outdraw on the turn in case Hamilton has something like A-6, A-5, pocket 7’s or pocket 8’s. But Hamilton most likely would have bet the flop with any of those hands. To check the flop with a non-threatening board after a big pre-flop raise usually means that he missed completely or hit a great hand. But Vincent’s check on the flop gained him no information on Hamilton’s hand, which makes the all-in move on the turn a huge mistake. Also he should have realized by Hamilton’s bet that he wasn’t going to lay down his hand since he was pot committed.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1994
$10,000 Main Event: The importance of a kicker – Russ Hamilton vs. Hugh Vincent
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Russ Hamilton | 72.4% | 83.3% | 93.2% | 100% |
Hugh Vincent | 27.6% | 16.7% | 6.8% | 0 |
In the final hand of the tournament Hugh Vincent limped with the 8♣ 5♥ and Hamilton checked with the K♠ 8♥. The flop came 8♠ 2♠ 6♦, giving both players top pair but Hamilton had the better kicker. Hamilton checked, Vincent bet $100,000 and Hamilton moved all-in with about $750,000 more. Vincent called only to find out that he was drawing to three outs for a two-pair. The turn came with the T♣ and the river brought the J♠, giving both players a pair of 8’s but Hamilton won with the K-kicker. Hamilton won the title and $1,000,000 in prize money.
Vincent’s call was obviously a mistake since he had no kicker to his top pair and no information on Hamilton’s hand since the pot was unraised. He wasn’t pot committed and could only beat a bluff. In case Hamilton would have semi-bluffed with a flush draw and/or straight draw, he is likely to have overcards as well. With that type of draw against him, Vincent would have been either a slight favorite or an underdog.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1993
$10,000 Main Event: Rags against rags – Jim Bechtel vs. Glen Cozen
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jim Bechtel | 61.4% | 75.2% | 86.4% | 100% |
Glen Cozen | 38.6% | 24.8% | 13.6% | 0 |
When the last hand was played, Glen Cozen had a short stack and Jim Bechtel was the chip leader. On the third hand they played heads-up, Cozen moved all-in with the 7♠ 4♦ only to be called by Bechtel’s J♣ 6♥. The flop came T♦ 8♠ 3♣, giving no help to either player. The turn was the 2♣ and the river brought the 5♦. Giving Bechtel the winning hand with a J-high.
This is what eventually happens when one player is short stacked and the other player has a large stack. The short stack moves in with a weak hand and gets called by another weak hand.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1992
$10,000 Main Event: A slow-play that back fired – Hamid Dastmalchi vs. Tom Jacobs
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hamid Dastmalchi | 36.7% | 16.8% | 90.9% | 100% |
Tom Jacobs | 63.3% | 83.2% | 9.1% | 0 |
In the final hand between Hamid Dastmalchi and Tom Jacobs, the former held the 8♥ 4♣ and the latter held the J♦ 7♠ when the flop came J♥ 5♦ 7♦. Jacobs under-bet his top two-pair in an effort to lure Dastmalchi in. Dastmalchi sat and pondered for a while before making the call with his gut-shot straight draw. The 6♥ came on the turn giving Dastmalchi a straight. He checked to Jacobs who moved all-in and Dastmalchi called. The 8♣ came on the river, which was no help to either player. Dastmalchi won the title and $1,000,000 in prize money.
In this hand, the danger of slow-playing any hand, even with an unthreatening board, was revealed. However, Jacobs was in a position that required him to gamble and the risk he took by under-betting the pot was small as compared to the potential rewards.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1991
$10,000 Main Event: Marginal Hand Punished – Don Holt vs. Brad Daugherty
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brad Daugherty | 64.4% | 78.5% | 81.8% | 100% |
Don Holt | 35.6% | 21.5% | 18.2% | 0 |
In the $10,000 no-limit Hold’em tournament at the WSOP the final hand was played as follows. Don Holt limped in from the button with the 7♥ 3♥ and Brad Daugherty raised $75,000 more with the K♠ J♠. Holt called and the flop came 8♦ 9♥ J♣. This flop gave Holt a three-flush and a gut-shot straight draw, but it gave Daugherty top pair. Daugherty checked and Holt moved all-in for about $450,000. Daugherty, who had the chip lead, didn’t take much time to call Holt’s semi-bluff. When the 5♣ hit on the turn it gave Holt four more outs (eight in total), as any T or 6 on the river would give him a straight. The 8♠ came on the river and made Brad Daugherty the 1991 WSOP champion.
Holt made his first mistake by calling the $75,000 raise before the flop when he only had a small amount invested in the pot. His second mistake was moving all-in on the flop with nothing more than a gut-shot straight draw and backdoor potential. Had he checked the flop, Daugherty would most likely have bet the turn. If Holt had moved in then instead, Daugherty would have had a tougher call to make. Still the all-in bet on the flop could have succeeded, to call a big bet like that with only a pair of J’s is a good call by Daugherty. Usually players don’t like to risk giving a free card when the flop is as coordinated as in this hand, so Daugherty’s check on the flop probably smelled like weakness to Holt.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1990
$10,000 Main Event: The miracle river card – Hans “Tuna” Lund vs. Mansour Matloubi
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mansour Matloubi | 72.5% | 78.2% | 4.5% | 100% |
Hans Lund | 27.5% | 21.8% | 95.5% | 0 |
With the blinds at $15,000-$30,000 Matloubi raised $75,000 with the T♦ T♣. Lund who was the chip leader called with the A♣ 9♦. The flop came 9♠ 2♣ 4♦, giving Lund top pair with top kicker, and Matloubi an overpair. Lund checked, Matloubi made a $100,000 bet and Lund check-raised $250,000 more. Matloubi studied for a while before he called the $250,000 and reraised all-in for another $378,000. Now Lund had to think for a while but finally he decided to call the raise. When the hands were turned over everybody could see that Lund only had five outs (any ace or nine) to beat Matloubi’s pocket T’s. The A♠ hit on the turn, a miracle card for Lund who now had top two pair and could only lose if one out of the two tens left hit on the river (a 22-1 shot). When the ace hit, Matloubi was standing up and kicked his chair, as he was very likely to get eliminated in second place. Yet, another miracle card hit on the river, the T♠ that gave Matloubi a set of T’s to beat Lund’s two pair. Lund went from underdog, to almost certain win and then lost the pot (it had more than 80% of all chips in it). This was the turning point in the match and Matloubi eventually went on to win the title after his pocket 6’s held up against Lund’s pocket 4’s.
There is not much to say on the play before the flop. On the flop Lund pot committed himself when he decided to go for the check-raise. Even though he probably thought he was beat when Matloubi moved all-in, Lund had invested a lot of chips on the hand and that made it hard to fold. Since there were no likely draws on the flop, Lund had to strongly suspect that he was beat and that he only had a maximum of 5 outs to outdraw. But the slight possibility that Matloubi was bluffing or had a worse hand, the size of the pot and the fact that Lund might have 5 outs to outdraw, made him call.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1989
$10,000 Main Event: The two black nines – Phil Hellmuth vs. Johnny Chan
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Phil Helmuth | 67.6% | 73.3% | 70.5% | 100% |
Johnny Chan | 32.4% | 26.7% | 29.5% | 0 |
When the final hand came up, the blinds were $5,000-$10,000 and the ante was $2,000. Phil Hellmuth raised $35,000 with the 9♠ 9♣, Johnny Chan re-raised $165,000 with the A♠ 7♠ and Hellmuth moved all-in for $1,000,000. Chan thought for quite some time before calling with his remaining $450,000. The flop came K♣ T♥ K♦, which gave Hellmuth two-pair and Chan five outs to draw out. The turn was the Q♠. This gave Chan seven additional outs and made Hellmuth a 2.5:1 (approximately) favorite. The river brought the 6♠, thus giving Hellmuth the title and $755,000 in prize money.
When entering the 1989 $10, 000 WSOP, Chan already had the main events of 1987 and 1988 under his belt, most certainly an amazing winning streak and quite possibly undefeated. In this tournament, however, it is possible that Chan made a mistake when he called Hellmuth’s all-in bet as a 2:1 underdog, though he could have only really been in a really bad position against AA. Since Chan was the more experienced player of the two, he may have been able to save his chips and attempt to outplay Hellmuth later on.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1988
$10,000 Main Event: Flopping the nuts – Johnny Chan vs. Erik Seidel
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Johnny Chan | 45.7% | 96.7% | 100% | 100% |
Erik Seidel | 54.3% | 3.3% | 0 | 0 |
This hand, which was featured in the movie “Rounders”, began with both players limping into the pot. Chan held the J♣ 9♣ and Seidel had the Q♣ 7♥. The flop came Q♠ T♥ 8♦, giving Chan the nut straight and Seidel top-pair. Chan bet out on the flop making the bet $40,000, Seidel raised $50,000 and Chan smooth-called. The turn came with the 2♠, which did not affect either hand. Chan checked and Seidel moved all-in. Chan then called. When the hands were turned over, Seidel quickly realized that he was drawing dead with one card to come. The river brought the 6♦. This hand won Chan his second title and $700,000 in prize money.
In the last hand, Chan trapped Seidel and made him believe that either he held the best hand or that Chan was weak. Very nicely set up by Johnny Chan.
NO-LIMIT HOLD’EM WSOP 1987
$10,000 Main Event: Overbetting the pot – Johnny Chan vs. Bob Ciaffone
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Johnny Chan | 43.3% | 81.3% | ||
Bob Ciaffone | 56.6% | 18.7% |
When it was down to three players (Johnny Chan, Bob Ciaffone and Frank Henderson) the following hand came up. The blinds were $10,000-$20,000 with an ante of $2,000. Ciaffone had $665,000; Chan had $525,000 and Henderson had about $250,000 when Chan limped on the button with the K♥ Q♥ and Henderson also limped from the small blind. Ciaffone looked down at the A♦ 4♦ and decided to raise the pot $85,000 more. Chan called the raise and Henderson folded his hand. The flop came K♣ J♥ 4♣ giving Chan top pair and Ciaffone bottom pair with an overcard. Ciaffone bet out $185,000 at the pot and Chan moved all-in for a $240,000 raise. Ciaffone thought for a long time and then decided to call. Chan’s pair of K’s held up and later he went on to win the tournament (his first $10,000 WSOP, but he won the next year in 1988 and finished second in 1989).
Ciaffone analyses this hand in his book “Pot-limit & no-limit poker”. He felt that his pre-flop raise and the call on the flop were reasonable. But the bet on the flop was a mistake. Worth to mention is that he overbet the pot, both pre-flop and on the flop. It was these bets that made the pot so big and in the end made his call reasonable. He justifies the call by saying that he probably had 5 outs to win the pot plus the fact that Chan might be drawing (although unlikely) and that he had the opportunity to knock out one of the greatest players in the world. He felt that if he won the pot he would be a huge favorite to win, which is true. What about Chan’s pre-flop call? He did call a big bet with a hand that was a slight underdog, but he didn’t know that for sure. Three-handed, KQs is a good hand. Even though he indeed had the worst hand going in, Chan probably felt that he could outplay Ciaffone on the later betting rounds and he had the better position.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1987
$10,000 Main Event: A coinflip – Johnny Chan vs. Frank Henderson
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Johnny Chan | 45.9% | 28.3% | 13.6% | 100% |
Frank Henderson | 54.1% | 71.7% | 86.4% | 0 |
Chan raised $60,000 with the A♠ 9♣ and Henderson moved in for another $300,000 with the 4♦ 4♣. The flop came 5♣ 8♥ K♦ and the turn brought the T♣. When the 9♥ hit on the river, Chan won the title and $461,000 in prize money.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1985
$10,000 Main Event: Too much faith – TJ Cloutier vs. Bill Smith
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bill Smith | 66.6% | 69.2% | 70.5% | 100% |
TJ Cloutier | 33.4% | 30.8% | 29.5% | 0 |
When Smith and Cloutier got down to playing heads-up, Cloutier had the most chips. Then Cloutier lost a big pot with pocket 9’s against Smith’s pocket K’s and that pot made Smith a big chip leader. Cloutier chipped away at Smith, who was an alcoholic and was drunk at that point which made it easy for Cloutier to get his chips. Cloutier got back to about a quarter of the total amount in chips. According to Cloutier, Smith was the tightest player in the world when sober, maybe the best player in the world when he was half-drunk and a horrible player when drunk. Smith raised the pot with pocket 3’s, Cloutier moved-all in with an A-3 and Smith called. The flop came down 4-5-10, giving Cloutier seven outs to win (any ace or deuce). No help came on the turn or river and Smith won the title.
According to Cloutier, he didn’t even look at his kicker before he moved in his whole stack. His reasoning was that he probably had the best hand anyway or two overcards if Smith had a pair. This must be considered a mistake by Cloutier. What makes the play even worse is the fact that Cloutier was the better player of the two and Smith was drunk which, in Cloutier’s own words, meant that he played horrible. When a player feels he can outplay his opponent in the long run, there is no reason for playing weak hands all-in pre-flop.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1981
$10,000 Main Event: Set over set – Bobby Baldwin vs. Perry Green
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Perry Green | 81.2% | 8.6% | 4.5% | 100% |
Bobby Baldwin | 18.8% | 91.4% | 95.5% | 0 |
When the final table was down to seven players the following hand came up. Baldwin held the 9♣ 9♥ and Green had the Q♣ Q♦. The flop came 9♠ 4♥ 3♣, giving Green an overpair to the board and Baldwin top set. Baldwin checked and Green bet $40,000. Baldwin, who had the most chips of the two, then raised $86,000 and putting Green all-in if he calls. Green thought for a while but decided to call. The hands were flipped face up on the table and Green realized that he only had two outs to hit or he would be out of the tournament. The turn came with the J♥ and the river brought the miracle Q♠. This pot gave Green enough chips to last until playing heads up with Stu Ungar for the title.
This hand shows how much the luck factor can mean in one specific hand. Green’s 8.5% chance of winning the hand on the turn or river meant either elimination or a chance to win the tournament and a huge difference in prize money. If Baldwin, who was one of the greatest players at the table had won the pot he would have been a big favorite to win the title instead he went out soon after this hand was played.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1981
$10,000 Main Event: Draw against draw – Stu Ungar vs. Perry Green
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stu Ungar | 65.3% | 71.6% | 77.3% | 100% |
Perry Green | 34.6% | 28.4% | 22.7% | 0 |
When the final hand of the tournament was played, Stu Ungar raised with the A♥ Q♥ and Perry Green called holding the T♠ 9♦. The flop came 8♥ 7♦ 4♥, giving Ungar two overcards and the nut flush draw. Perry flopped the nut straight draw and had two overcards to the board. Green , who was first to act, decided to move all-in on a semi-bluff and Ungar called. Green needed a J, T, 9 or 6 that was not a heart, thus giving him 12 outs in total. The turn brought the 4♠, which was of no assistance to Green. The Q♦ fell on the river and won the title for Ungar. It was Ungar’s second victorious tournament in a row and it awarded him $375,000 in prize money.
Both gentlemen played well in this hand.
NO-LIMIT TEXAS HOLD’EM WSOP 1980
$10,000 Main Event: Betting small on the flop – Stu Ungar vs. Doyle Brunson
Best hand percentage | Pre-flop | Flop | Turn | River |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stu Ungar | 39% | 17.8% | 90.9% | 100% |
Doyle Brunson | 61% | 82.2% | 9.1% | 0 |
When the final hand of the tournament was played between Stu Ungar and Doyle Brunson, they were almost even in chips. Brunson raised with the A♥ 7♠ and Ungar called with the 5♠ 4♠. The pot was at approximately $17,000 when the flop came A♦ 7♦ 2♣, giving Brunson top two-pair and Ungar a gut-shot straight draw. Ungar checked, Brunson made a pot-sized bet of roughly $17,000 and then Ungar called. The turn brought the 3♥, giving Ungar a 5-high straight and the nut hand. At this point, Ungar bet out about $30,000 and Brunson decided to move all-in. The river brought the 2♦ and, thus, proved useless to Brunson. Ungar won his first main event title along with $375,000 in prize money.
Brunson was of the opinion that he bet too small on the flop. Generally, in this situation, he would have bet big in order to throw his opponent off. However, this time he decided to trap Ungar though he believes it was a mistake to move all-in on the turn. Brunson felt that had he just flat-called, Ungar would have shut down on the river when the board was paired and made both a flush and a full house possible.
-
4.3
- Rakeback 5%
- $55 Stake Cash + 260K Gold Coins
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware
18+ | Play Responsibly | T&C Apply
-
4.1
- 1,000 Chips Daily
- FREE 5,000 Chips
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware
-
- 2,500 Gold Coins + 0.50 Sweeps Coins
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware
18+ | Play Responsibly | T&C Apply
-
- 150% up to 25 SC
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware
Terms & Conditions apply
-
- 5%
- 200% Gold on 1st Purchase
T&Cs Apply | Play Responsibly | GambleAware
Terms & Conditions apply