A Step-by-Step Guide to the Independent Chip Model (ICM)

Recommended Poker Sites – Editor’s Pick

Table of Content

ICM Calculations is short for Independent Chip Model Calculations – which every tournament poker player inevitably makes sooner or later.

PokerOlymp’s Arved Klöhn explains what this term means, how ICM Calculations are used in poker and why you should be familiar with it. Let’s start with a very simple question: What’s a chip worth in a poker tournament? This answer in itself is the whole purpose of ICM.

Why Should You Become an ICM Calculator?

Knowing the value of your chips at various stages of a tournament is a big leg up. Let’s say you’re sitting in a poker tournament, have a comfortable stack and the bubble is approaching. Wouldn’t you like to know how much money you can expect to win in the long run?

What about doubling up? Is it worth jeopardizing your healthy stack right before the bubble? And how much would it hurt your expectation to lose half your stack?

Example: You open-raise to 2.5 big blinds from the cutoff with 9 8 late in a tournament. Three players with varying stack sizes remain to act behind you. Your raise might look standard, but ICM considerations will drastically affect whether this open is profitable. If you risk chips unnecessarily when shorter stacks are close to busting, you might lose long-term equity despite potential short-term gains.

The specific payout structure of poker tournaments makes all those questions quite tricky. Twice as many chips are not always twice as valuable. Sometimes it’s much more important to just survive the bubble (or the next payout jump) than to accumulate more chips. Simply counting your chips will rarely help you to exactly evaluate your tournament situation.

What’s the Value of a Chip in a Poker Tournament?

Let’s take a very simple example. Say you’re playing a sit-and-go:

  • Buy-in: $10
  • # of players: 10
  • Payouts: 1st – $50, 2nd – $30, 3rd – $20
  • Initial stack: 1,000 Chips

Right at the beginning of this tournament, 1,000 chips are obviously worth $10. But as the tournament progresses their value will change drastically.

Let’s assume you barely make it into the money, and after seven players have busted, you still have 1,000 chips. Now you’re guaranteed at least third-place money. So your 1,000 chips are worth at least $20. Even if you somehow made it into the money with just one single chip, this one chip would still be worth at least $20.

The value of chips can increase enormously during a tournament. But their value can also decrease. Let’s say you manage to win the sit-and-go. Then you will have all 10,000 chips, but only receive a $50 payout. So now 1,000 of your chips are only worth $5.

The poker community came up with the Independent Chip Model to attach precise monetary values to chip counts. Every professional tournament player is familiar with this model and you should be too.

Related Reading:

How ICM Works in Poker

The Independent Chip Model condenses the following two things into one value for each player:

  • The payout structure
  • The stack sizes of all remaining players

Based on the stack sizes the ICM calculates for each player the probability of finishing 1st, 2nd, etc. and multiplies those probabilities with the payouts for each position.

To calculate the probability of a certain player finishing first it simply divides the number of his chips by the total amount of chips in play. The probabilities for finishing 2nd or lower are calculated in a similar but slightly more complex manner.

The calculations are in fact so complex that you usually need a computer. For 4 players one has to go though more than 20 steps of calculations. For 10 players you already need millions.

Fortunately many decent ICM calculators are freely available online.

An Easy ICM Calculation Example

Lets go back to our previous sit-and-go example:

  • Buy-in: $10
  • # of players: 10
  • Payouts: 1st – $50, 2nd – $30, 3rd – $20
  • Initial stack: 1,000 Chips

Now let’s assume after some time only 4 players are left and these are their stack sizes:

  • Player 1: 5,000 Chips
  • Player 2: 2,000 Chips
  • Player 3: 2,000 Chips
  • Player 4: 1,000 Chips

Now what’s the value of those chips? Simply enter the stack sizes and payouts into an ICM calculator and you will get the following results:

  • Player 1: 5,000 Chips ≅ $37.18
  • Player 2: 2,000 Chips ≅ $24.33
  • Player 3: 2,000 Chips ≅ $24.33
  • Player 4: 1,000 Chips ≅ $14.17

If we assume all players are equally skilled, they can expect to win that much in the long run.

Player 1, holding 50% of all chips, will make considerably more than second-place money. Player 2 and 3 can expect to win a bit more than third-place money. Even the short stacked Player 4 can expect to win some money.

How to Make Good Decisions Based on ICM

Now we know what the chips are worth in the long run, but how does this knowledge help us make better decisions right now?

Let’s return to our example and, for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume there are no blinds or ante in play and you are Player 3. The following situation comes up:

  • Player 1 (BU): 5,000 Chips
  • Player 2 (SB): 2,000 Chips
  • Player 3, you (BB): 2,000 Chips
  • Player 4 (UTG): 1,000 Chips

Player 4 and Player 1 both fold and Player 2 goes all-in for 2,000 Chips. You hold Ace-Nine (unsuited) and …?

Should you call or should you fold?

Let’s further assume you know Player 2 pretty well because you play very often against him and you know he’s bluffing quite often in those situations. Overall you assume you will win the showdown six out 10 times if you call his all-in.

So you’re a favorite to win if you call but in tournaments it’s sometimes not enough to simply be the favorite. Let’s analyze the situation by using ICM. Three things can happen after Player 2 goes all-in:

  1. You fold (stack sizes stay the same)
  2. You call and win (now you have 4,000 chips and Player 2 is busted)
  3. You call and lose (now you are busted and Player 2 has 4,000 chips)

For all 3 situations we can now calculate the ICM values:

Stacks after foldICM-EVStacks after call and winICM-EVStacks after call and lossICM-EV
Player 15,000$37.185,000$38.895,000$38.89
Player 22,000$24.330$04,000$36.44
Player 3 (you)2,000$24.334,000$36.440$0
Player 41,000$14.171,000$24.671,000$24.67

This means if you call and win you will have 4,000 chips and those chips will net $36.44 in the long run. But if you call and lose you will have zero chips and those will net you $0 in the long run.

We’ve already established that you win the showdown 60% of the time. So we can easily calculate your expected value (EV) for calling:

  • EV = 60% * $36.44 + 40% * $0 = $21.86

On average you can expect to win $21.86 if you call the all-in. Now let’s compare this number to your expected value if you simply fold: $24.33 – that’s over $2 more!

This means in this example the ICM advises a fold as the best play in the long run although you are a 60% favorite to win the hand! But why is a fold the better option?

Simply put: Player 4, the short stack, forces you to fold although he isn’t even involved in the hand. It’s much better for you to wait for him to bust than to jeopardize all your chips.

If you wait patiently he will probably bust before you do and you will have the third-place money guaranteed. But if you call the all-in, there is a very reasonable chance you will bust first yourself.

ICM takes those considerations into account and correctly advises you to fold.

Related Reading:

Five Handy ICM Guidelines

  1. Tighter in Tournaments: ICM always advises to call with tighter ranges in tournaments than in cash games.
  2. The First Chip: Your first chip is always the most valuable. Doubling your stack never doubles the value of your chips (it’s always less).
  3. Correct ICM During Bubbles: With a medium-sized stack on the bubble, you should avoid coin flips (or 60/40 all-ins) and fold instead.
  4. Watch Your Shoves: Correct ICM play usually advises you to avoid narrow all-ins if there are players left with fewer chips than you.
  5. Big Stack Bullies: Big stacks can often threaten medium-stacked players during the bubble because they should only call with narrow ranges.

The Limitations of ICM

Currently the Independent Chip Model is the best-known method to value chips and evaluate tournament situations.

But although it’s broadly used and acknowledged, ICM is not flawless. Some of the drawbacks are:

  • ICM does not consider the position of a poker player (a 4BB stack on the button is usually much more valuable than the same stack in first position)
  • ICM does not take skill differences into account
  • ICM does not consider potential future situations (sometimes it’s better to pass on small edges and wait for a larger edge).

Using ICM to Improve Your Tournament Game Overall

Obviously you can’t run calculations like the one we just did on the fly at the table. You’re not going to calculate your expected ICM value during a poker game. But ICM knowledge helps you tremendously to work on your game and to develop the right instincts for how to act and react in certain situations at the table.

Several ICM calculators are available online (unfortunately the good ones are not free), which guide you through many different tournament situations advising the best play.

Modern ICM Applications

Professional players today often refine ICM with more advanced concepts to account for dynamic table conditions. As the game evolves, it’s not enough to rely purely on stack sizes and payouts; considerations such as player skill, distribution of chips around the table, and real-time adjustments become crucial. While ICM remains fundamental, experienced players incorporate these extra layers to stay ahead of the curve.

Integrating Future Game Simulation

Future Game Simulation goes beyond static ICM calculations by projecting how chips might change hands in subsequent orbits. This approach factors in who’s about to post blinds, who has position on whom, and the likelihood of certain opponents tangling with each other. By anticipating possible outcomes, players can make more accurate decisions on whether to pursue a marginal all-in or preserve their stack for a potentially more favorable spot. Such simulation methods add a dynamic perspective to traditional ICM, recognizing that your equity can shift dramatically within just a few hands.

Adjusting for Individual Opponents’ Ranges

While basic ICM calculations assume all players are of equal skill and generally play a broad range of hands in proportion to their stack sizes, real-world conditions differ. Some players are tighter, some are looser, and some excel at pressuring medium stacks near pay jumps. Adapting your ICM approach based on these tendencies will yield more precise decisions. When you identify an opponent who three-bets aggressively on the bubble, you might sacrifice small edges in normal ICM calculations to avoid a confrontation that can derail your run. Conversely, if you face overly cautious players, you can exploit them with well-timed raises, knowing they are less likely to risk their tournament lives without premium hands.

FAQ

What is the Independent Chip Model (ICM)?

The Independent Chip Model is a method used to estimate the monetary value of a poker tournament stack by calculating a player’s chances of finishing in each payout position, based on their current number of chips relative to the total in play.

Why does ICM sometimes advise folding when you have a strong hand?

ICM factors in the risk of busting relative to the reward of accumulating more chips. Even if you are ahead, losing the hand and finishing out of the money can be more detrimental than the potential gains from doubling your stack, especially if shorter stacks are about to bust.

Is skill level ever part of ICM calculations?

Standard ICM assumes equal skill across all players, so it does not inherently account for differing skill levels. However, experienced players make manual adjustments, factoring in their own skill edge or recognizing specific weaknesses in opponents to optimize decisions beyond raw ICM calculations.

How does the presence of a very short stack affect decisions under ICM?

A very short stack exerts pressure on medium stacks by increasing the value of survival. If you risk busting before the short stack, you lose the chance of moving up in payouts. ICM reflects that risk, often advising tighter calls and fewer coin-flip confrontations.

Why are push/fold scenarios so common under ICM considerations?

Push/fold strategies simplify decision-making by going all-in or folding in high-pressure situations, especially near the bubble. ICM shows that small edges in chip EV can sometimes be detrimental to your overall equity if they jeopardize your ability to move up in the payouts.

Do big stacks always have an advantage under ICM?

Big stacks can leverage their chip advantage to pressure medium stacks into tighter folds, particularly around pay jumps. However, they must still make calculated moves. An overly aggressive big stack can lose chips to short stacks who pick spots carefully, especially in higher-skill environments.

Related Poker Strategy Articles:

Recommended